[CQ-Contest] Working Split In A Contest Is Verboten!

[Barry]

Not true.  If the callsign and power given aren't valid for the 
location, it's bogus.

Barry W2UP

On 2/22/2016 16:59, WW3S wrote:
> well, if they dont submit a log, the qso’s shouldnt be removed.....they are not a unique, since many worked them, be interesting to see how it gets handled....
>
>> On 2/22/2016 2:56:31 PM, Tom Hammond (thammond at chartermi.net) wrote:
>>> Well, I admit that I fell prey to this, twice! www.qrz.com/db/gj0ke comes up
>> blank. Geesh...
>>
>> I worked "them" on 15M at 18:04 and on 20M at 20:59. That means that "they"
>> were operating for at least 3 hours handing out bogus points. Who would do
>> such a thing? Why?
>>
>> I passed through Jersey on a business trip once, and working them reminded
>> me of it. I wondered to myself why Jersey could run a KW while the rest of
>> the UK can only run 400W. I was had, but good.
>>
>> I wonder if I would have caught ID0IOT or DU0PE (both poor examples, I
>> admit) in my oblivious state.
>>
>> I'm feeling seriously disappointed by my fraternal brethren, and in myself a
>> bit.
>>
>> Tom
>> K8BKM
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ron
>> Notarius W3WN
>> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 12:03 PM
>> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Working Split In A Contest Is Verboten!
>>
>> Speaking of things that are "verboten" in a contest (or should be)...
>>
>>
>> Under the category of WFWL, anyone else raise an eyebrow over "GJ0KE" ?  I
>> caught him (or whomever it was using that call) on 15 CW on Saturday.  The
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest