[CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured

[Bob Kupps]

Well here's my suggestion that always disappears in every smoke-filled CAC meeting -
The CQ WW would be more interesting, not to mention far more fair, for the competitors in SA, AF, AS and OC to be awarded 2 points for intracontinental QSOs in the same way NA stations are. It is EU not NA that has the exceptional geography, and the entire contest would benefit by the same increased incentives for activating rare multipliers in those areas as is the case for Caribbean stations in NA.
73 Bob HS0ZIA



      From: Randy Thompson K5ZD <k5zd at charter.net>
 To: cq-contest at contesting.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 5:13 AM
 Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured
   
Other than moving some tectonic plates, what do you suggest would make CQ WW
more interesting for those not bordering the Atlantic Ocean?

Not useful to complain without offering a suggestion.

Randy, K5ZD

> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Jim Brown
> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 4:09 PM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured
> 
> On Sat,7/16/2016 4:21 PM, Barry wrote:
> > Was a requirement for consideration having grown up in NJ? :-)
> 
> qrz.com shows that all LIVE in the golden eastern half of NA. So VERY
> unlikely that anything will happen to make these contests interesting for
> stations contesting outside the Atlantic basin.
> 
> 73, Jim K9YC
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest