[CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured

[VE2TZT]

On 19/07/2016 13:48, Helmut Mueller wrote:
> You want to win it sitting in your arm chair at home?
yes !!!!!!!

and I work hard to have my home station efficient while staying reasonable.
> You are wondering why DX will not be present anymore in a DX contest?
As it is already the case my proposition cannot be the reason of 
decreasing DX, then why giving advantage to a handful a guys against all 
others ?

Creating 70 more multipliers we do not need anymore those few exotic 
multipliers just having to pay to win

And by far I would prefer to have bigger runs than those 10 or 15 exotic 
multipliers in my log.

Gilles VA2EW
> You are wondering why CN, D4, CT3, P4 e.t.c. stops spending $$$$$$$$$ if you
> can win it from home?
>
> Good luck!
>
> Why not try IOTA, WAEDC or any other of the 100+ contests with different
> rules?
>
> DX contest should stay a DX contest where exotic places matter.
>
> 73
>
> Helmut
>
>   
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] Im Auftrag von
> VE2TZT
> Gesendet: Tuesday, 19 July, 2016 06:37 PM
> An: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Betreff: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured
>
> -1 point per contact for everybody whatever the country, the continent or
> the zone. (no more indecent continental border advantage as EA8, CN or even
> some extreme East Coast)
>
> -The US states, the Canadian provinces and the Japanese call area become
> multipliers (then the multiplier potential in NA should be about the same as
> in EU)
>
> Globally with that rules the East coast beams should turn 180 degrees more
> often and perhaps that should give more motivation to have some more traffic
> in NA during the second half of the night.
>
> Gilles VA2EW
>
>
> On 18/07/2016 18:13, Randy Thompson K5ZD wrote:
>> Other than moving some tectonic plates, what do you suggest would make
>> CQ WW more interesting for those not bordering the Atlantic Ocean?
>>
>> Not useful to complain without offering a suggestion.
>>
>> Randy, K5ZD
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf
>>> Of Jim Brown
>>> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 4:09 PM
>>> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
>>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured
>>>
>>> On Sat,7/16/2016 4:21 PM, Barry wrote:
>>>> Was a requirement for consideration having grown up in NJ? :-)
>>> qrz.com shows that all LIVE in the golden eastern half of NA. So VERY
>>> unlikely that anything will happen to make these contests interesting
>>> for stations contesting outside the Atlantic basin.
>>>
>>> 73, Jim K9YC
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus