[CQ-Contest] ....youth in contesting

[Trent Sampson]

Perhaps it is why we need to keep contest managers in check when they change rules that are to the detriment of tech advantage - 
The extra levels of superb placed by the Russians at CN2AA or the lads at 4O3A have made a lot of us realise there is a whole other world out there in how far you can extend a station. 
I live in dread that an over zealous contest manger changes the rules in such a way that these high tech stations are disadvantaged and we dumb the hobby down again... 



TrentVK4TS PO Box 275 Mooloolaba 4557 0408497550


> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 23:04:10 -0400
> From: thompson at mindspring.com
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ....youth in contesting
> 
>  
>   I agree with several reports that it took several years for amateur radio and amateur radio contesting to catch up with the computer revolution. I bought my first CAT YAESU in 1983 but it only supported the old apple not the newer IBM PC.  I would up with a Wang Professional PC in 1985 and finally got a DOS program and proper interface to run PC control of the transceiver.  K4SB (SK) had written a program for the TRS-80 and adapted it to the IBM PC.  Still no real logging programs insight for contesting until K1EA wrote CT and Dave K8CC wrote NA.
> 
> Don N4IN asked me to help with the CQ WW 160 Contests as he needed PC help and help with the SSB section that started in 1881.  He and K4SB had written simple programs for his TRS-80 The main program was a master list which started with big logs like WB9Z being typed in.  The log checking program was low level and all logs were hand written so trying to use the log checking program was not feasible.  His XYL Helen got an IBM PC in about 1989 and I got K4SB to help move the programs to the PC.  By 1992 many logs were in NA or CT but culling out actual QSOs from header and break lines was difficult.  Don viewed each log as a personal letter to him and he would spend hours manually cross checking the logs.  I have examples of logs that were at best almost pure  fabrications.  As many as 60% were uniques and one log had maybe 300 good QSOs in a 1200 QSO log.  HE DQed several each year and I now did the same for SSB.  We got about 50% of the logs into K4SB's programs but still did
>   manual cross checking.  I got several SEDXC hams to help but it was obvious we needed something better.  
> 
> The cabrillo format was designed by several active contesters led by Trey now N5KO.  After Don passed away I found WT4I was writing a log checking suite that even included a cabrillo converter for programs like CT and NA.
> I sure could have used this in past years. 
> 
> I feel there is still resistance to new technologies today and we OT's can often stand in the way of younger contesters and innovation.  
> 
> Back when I started contesting in 1958 many were youngsters as young as 10. Dave K1ZZ was into contesting at an early age and I remember a quote in a 1969 QST for the ARRL SS "that youngsters were snapping up many awards."  As many of us age we need to welcome the new hams into contesting and remember we are competing with gamers like my son who spend hours on line.  He got his degree in IT and now works for a Fiber optic Cisco Competitor.  His attitude is amateur radio is far behind the technology curve. This was echoed by the then the FCC Chairman and son of Colin Powell. On a flight he saw me reading QST and upon asking if I was a ham he asked if we still used old technologies such as CW, RTTY, or SSB.  This was about 15 years or more ago. 
> 
> Dave K4JRB
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


	
		This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www.avast.com