[CQ-Contest] Dupes in FAQ's

[Ken K6MR]

That is the downside of all these calls that are close and are all active.  I never had this problem when I was WB6VFJ… :^)

Ken K6MR  (not K6MM, K6MI, K6NR, etc., etc., )



From: john at kk9a.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 09:50
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes in FAQ's






Great Idea! I lost a 6 point QSO and a mult last weekend because the
stations thought that I was a dupe and went back to CQing. I worked (and
logged) all the dupes that called me.

John KK9A


To:     cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject:        [CQ-Contest] Dupes in FAQ's
From:   Tim Shoppa tshoppa at gmail.com
Date:   Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:11:33 -0400

Everyone was on one end or the other of the "you're a dupe"/"no I'm not"/"I
can't put you in the log again or I'll be penalized"/"no you won't be
penalized"/"look I worked you at xxxx" conversation this past weekend. It
hurts rate to have the conversation never mind the effort of spotting the
busted call several thousand QSO's ago in a big log - a job that I'm glad
is the logcheckers, and not mine!

I love the way the CQ WW FAQ talks about dupes. I strongly recommend that
this wording be plagiarized for every contest:

Q: Should I work and log duplicates? How are they counted by the log
checking?

A: Yes! Please log all contacts that you make even if they are duplicates.

Tim N3QE
__________

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest