[CQ-Contest] Convergence and Change
Mats Strandberg
sm6lrr at gmail.com
Fri May 20 22:21:45 EDT 2016
Davor,
With all respect for your efforts in trying to "prove the case", but your
conclusion says absolutely nothing.
You pick the raisins of the cake and try to prove that Unassisted is less
rewarding than Assisted. All is completely hypothetical, and we will never
know how much more points each of the Unassisted station would have gained
extra, in case they used assistance...
This issue is not related to the Top 10 at all. This is about stations in
normal locations, with less than Big Gun set up, competing with similar
stations in the same continent or country. In this group, you will see a
big advantage, when you compare both categories. That is, in case you knew
who was unassisted and who was not, and if the categories were joined. In
this way you will ensure that the contesters are in the same category, and
the obvious result is that best operators using assistance would have a
5-10% advantage at least...
I participated in SOAB(A) last year in CQWW CW. I am not against the class
as such, but I am very, very pleased that we have two different classes,
depending on the ambitions, the mood, and the location/station I am
operating from.
To force thousands of Unassisted into the same click and shoot group as the
others, is the first step to kill contesting really.
Just because some committees see bigger risk with non-calimed assistance,
and the challenge to detect such cheating, does not mean they solve the
cheating problem that way. Detecting cluster and RBN-cheating is far easier
than detecting excessive power cheating in all three power categories.
Believe me, my geopgraphic position gives me excellent feeling for which
stations power cheat, both in my own territory and in Europe...
The biggest challenge is for contest committees to trace and determine
power cheating - not in telling if a station cheats with cluster.
73 de Mats RM2D (SM6LRR)
2016-05-19 10:03 GMT+03:00 Davor Kucelin <davor.kucelin at plavalaguna.hr>:
> CQWW SSB Top 10 scores all years
>
>
>
> SOABHP
>
>
>
> 1 EA8BH 1999 SO HP ALL 25,646,796
> 10,253 176 692 - N5TJ
>
> 2 CN2R 2004 SO HP ALL 20,938,680
> 8,655 172 668 - W7EJ
>
> 3 D4B 2004 SO HP ALL 20,433,438
> 8,799 172 674 - 4L5A
>
> 4 D4B 2003 SO HP ALL 20,119,968
> 8,956 169 634 - 4L5A
>
> 5 CN2R 2003 SO HP ALL 18,743,250
> 8,682 152 594 - W7EJ
>
> 6 HC8A 1999 SO HP ALL 18,607,050
> 8,638 175 595 - N6KT
>
> 7 CN2R 2011 SO HP ALL 18,518,160
> 8,409 167 593 44.7 W7EJ
>
> 8 CN2R 2013 SO HP ALL 18,277,746
> 8,370 167 579 46.9 W7EJ [Cert]
>
> 9 HC8A 2000 SO HP ALL 18,122,040
> 9,160 163 547 - N6KT
>
> 10 8P5A 2013 SO HP ALL 17,059,840
> 10,126 162 518 48.0 W2SC
>
>
>
> SOAB ASSISTED HP
>
>
>
> 1 9Y4ZC 2003 SA HP ALL 14,979,055
> 8,114 137 500 - DL6FBL
>
> 2 P40A 2011 SA HP ALL 14,332,656
> 7,478 156 513 43.5 KK9A
>
> 3 TM6M 2015 SA HP ALL 14,263,470
> 7,057 168 667 47.9 F8DBF [Cert]
>
> 4 P40P 2002 SA HP ALL 12,975,732
> 6,639 154 528 - W5AJ
>
> 5 EF8U 2013 SA HP ALL 12,743,163
> 6,656 154 533 45.0 EA8RM [Cert]
>
> 6 NN3W 2011 SA HP ALL 11,828,236
> 4,921 185 683 44.7 @N3HBX
>
> 7 OH0X 2015 SA HP ALL 11,790,240
> 6,294 174 706 48.0 OH6KZP [Cert]
>
> 8 P40W 2003 SA HP ALL 11,755,443
> 6,730 137 496 - W2GD
>
> 9 D4B 2002 SA HP ALL 11,567,412
> 5,845 152 586 - 4L5A
>
>
>
> CQWW CW Top 10 scores all years
>
>
>
> SOABHP
>
>
>
> 1 EA8BH 2000 SO HP ALL 18,010,765
> 7,555 183 634 - N5TJ
>
> 2 ZF2MJ 2015 SO HP ALL 16,730,788
> 10,014 170 527 48.0 N6MJ [Cert]
>
> 3 CR3OO 2015 SO HP ALL 16,090,078
> 8,812 152 474 48.0 CT1BOH [Cert]
>
> 4 P40E 2003 SO HP ALL 15,943,070
> 7,828 169 546 - CT1BOH
>
> 5 EF8M 2011 SO HP ALL 15,846,012
> 7,873 160 531 48.0 RD3A
>
> 6 PZ5T 2011 SO HP ALL 15,673,940
> 7,592 173 545 47.4 VE3DZ
>
> 7 CR3E 2012 SO HP ALL 15,221,316
> 7,275 170 556 48.0 CT1BOH [Cert]
>
> 8 CR3E 2011 SO HP ALL 15,151,668
> 7,212 168 564 48.0 CT1BOH
>
> 9 EF8M 2010 SO HP ALL 15,117,795
> 7,598 158 535 47.8 RD3A
>
> 10 HC8N 1999 SO HP ALL 14,626,579
> 7,001 185 546 - N5KO
>
>
>
> SOAB ASSISTED HP
>
>
>
> 1 9Y4ZC 2004 SA HP ALL 14,581,665
> 6,576 169 596 - DL6FBL
>
> 2 5B/AA1TN 2004 SA HP ALL 13,715,573
> 6,381 170 627 - RW3QC
>
> 3 EF9O 2013 SA HP ALL 13,530,554
> 5,826 171 623 46.6 EA5BM [Cert]
>
> 4 K5ZD/1 2014 SA HP ALL 12,768,365
> 4,993 190 697 44.3 [Cert]
>
> 5 EF8U 2013 SA HP ALL 11,955,126
> 5,700 169 602 44.2 EA8RM [Cert]
>
> 6 CN3A 2010 SA HP ALL 11,818,159
> 5,729 156 577 46.4
>
> 7 NP4Z 2013 SA HP ALL 11,341,512
> 6,059 165 591 46.9
>
> 8 K5ZD/1 2015 SA HP ALL 11,275,488
> 4,742 179 654 44.9 [Cert]
>
> 9 CT9M 2002 SA HP ALL 11,225,452
> 5,181 159 605 - DL2CC
>
> 10 P40C 2014 SA HP ALL 11,085,536
> 6,242 154 462 44.8 KU1CW
>
>
>
> So what are we talking about?
>
> Best Assisted score is way below 10th unassisted score.
>
> What are you than scared about to combine the 2 categorys.
>
>
>
>
>
> 73 Dave 9A1UN
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list