[CQ-Contest] Convergence and Change
Joe
nss at mwt.net
Tue May 24 10:21:50 EDT 2016
Can you do the same thing but for SSB?
To remove the auto spotting of the RBN's and Skimmers.
Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 5/24/2016 8:51 AM, Randy Thompson K5ZD wrote:
> There is one example I am familiar with where you can compare SO to SOA. Go
> to
> http://www.cqww.com/searchbycall.htm?cl=k5zd
>
> and look at the last 5 years of CW results. Same station. Same op. Same
> level of intensity.
>
> To really tell the story, you have to look at the scores relative to other
> local ops. Say K1DG or K0DQ. Then you see that use of Assistance adds
> about 15% or so of an advantage in score. That is at the top levels. Need
> more data to see how it impacts a casual or part time entry.
>
>
> Randy, K5ZD
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
>> Joe
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 3:13 AM
>> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Convergence and Change
>>
>> Maybe the un assisted ops are just better operators in the first place,
>> and do not need help to make bigger scores?
>>
>> Is there records of great ops that never used assistance, and then
>> started using it but changed NOTHING else in the station, and how and
>> did their scores change? or the other way around some high scoring
>> assisted stations that go un assisted, do their scores drop?
>>
>> Too many variables to know if it helps or not unless stations that did
>> not suddenly do and visa versa.
>>
>> Joe WB9SBD
>> On 5/23/2016 10:24 AM, Dave Edmonds wrote:
>>> Congrats John...
>>>
>>> I've got a question... Based upon the scores you shared.... Is running
>>> "Assisted" really helping the operators improve their scores? The
>>> single op non-assisted are having higher scores. Why? I've seen this
>>> same thing in other contests too... Seems to me that Assisted ops
>>> would typically have higher scores than non-assisted ops....
>>>
>>> I'm game for one operator type category....I compete against assisted
>>> ops in many contests and still win...I just won another VAQP plaque.
>>>
>>> As many of y'all know, I don't have a computer in the ham shack and
>>> thoroughly enjoy contesting..Sometimes, I'll use a computer to log
>>> phone contests, but typically run P&P logging. I send with a paddle
>>> and keyer and use a mic (no voice memory keyer yet)..When you send
>>> with a keyboard and F Keys..IMO it's not cw..it's another digital
>>> mode... I hope we never get to a point where folks can't send with
>>> their hand..... I do enjoy technology (all work week), so running
>>> "techless" gives me a break from a computer screen. I never have to
>>> reboot either... I have to admit I do work "single band" in most very
>>> large contests to eliminate the dupes problem... I did my first "all
>>> band" WPX in March and dupes were challenging with 400 Qs in my first
>>> all band WPX effort. That new Extra ticket would have come in handy
>> during that one...
>>> Gotta love QSO Parties..
>>>
>>> 73s Dave WN4AFP
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 9:49 AM, john at kk9a.com <john at kk9a.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I got lucky and have the second highest assisted score ever. I ran a
>>>> single radio and had a poor internet connection which became more of
>>>> a distraction than assistance. I would be way down the list if some
>>>> of the better operators such as W2SC, N5TJ, N6KT, etc operated this
>> category.
>>>> John KK9A - P40A
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Convergence and Change
>>>> From: "Davor Kucelin" <davor.kucelin at plavalaguna.hr>
>>>> Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 09:03:10 +0200
>>>> List-post: <cq-contest at contesting.com">mailto:
>>>> cq-contest at contesting.com>
>>>> CQWW SSB Top 10 scores all years
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> SOABHP
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1 EA8BH 1999 SO HP ALL 25,646,796
>>>> 10,253 176 692 - N5TJ
>>>>
>>>> 2 CN2R 2004 SO HP ALL 20,938,680
>>>> 8,655 172 668 - W7EJ
>>>>
>>>> 3 D4B 2004 SO HP ALL 20,433,438
>>>> 8,799 172 674 - 4L5A
>>>>
>>>> 4 D4B 2003 SO HP ALL 20,119,968
>>>> 8,956 169 634 - 4L5A
>>>>
>>>> 5 CN2R 2003 SO HP ALL 18,743,250
>>>> 8,682 152 594 - W7EJ
>>>>
>>>> 6 HC8A 1999 SO HP ALL 18,607,050
>>>> 8,638 175 595 - N6KT
>>>>
>>>> 7 CN2R 2011 SO HP ALL 18,518,160
>>>> 8,409 167 593 44.7 W7EJ
>>>>
>>>> 8 CN2R 2013 SO HP ALL 18,277,746
>>>> 8,370 167 579 46.9 W7EJ [Cert]
>>>>
>>>> 9 HC8A 2000 SO HP ALL 18,122,040
>>>> 9,160 163 547 - N6KT
>>>>
>>>> 10 8P5A 2013 SO HP ALL 17,059,840
>>>> 10,126 162 518 48.0 W2SC
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> SOAB ASSISTED HP
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1 9Y4ZC 2003 SA HP ALL 14,979,055
>>>> 8,114 137 500 - DL6FBL
>>>>
>>>> 2 P40A 2011 SA HP ALL 14,332,656
>>>> 7,478 156 513 43.5 KK9A
>>>>
>>>> 3 TM6M 2015 SA HP ALL 14,263,470
>>>> 7,057 168 667 47.9 F8DBF [Cert]
>>>>
>>>> 4 P40P 2002 SA HP ALL 12,975,732
>>>> 6,639 154 528 - W5AJ
>>>>
>>>> 5 EF8U 2013 SA HP ALL 12,743,163
>>>> 6,656 154 533 45.0 EA8RM [Cert]
>>>>
>>>> 6 NN3W 2011 SA HP ALL 11,828,236
>>>> 4,921 185 683 44.7 @N3HBX
>>>>
>>>> 7 OH0X 2015 SA HP ALL 11,790,240
>>>> 6,294 174 706 48.0 OH6KZP
>> [Cert]
>>>> 8 P40W 2003 SA HP ALL 11,755,443
>>>> 6,730 137 496 - W2GD
>>>>
>>>> 9 D4B 2002 SA HP ALL 11,567,412
>>>> 5,845 152 586 - 4L5A
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list