[CQ-Contest] Convergence and Change

[Kelly Taylor]

Why is it so hard to just read the rules as they are? They're pretty clear. Most rules say packet/cluster and Skimmer (local or otherwise) are assistance.  Some add single-channel decoders. 

If it's not defined by the sponsor as assistance (sandwich-bearing spouses, pre-contest antenna-raising crews, computer logging, etc.), it's not assistance. 

Btw: I think eliminating entire categories to combat cheating is a fool's errand.

73, kelly, ve4xt 

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 26, 2016, at 10:38 AM, Yuri Blanarovich <k3bu at optimum.net> wrote:
> 
> Why is it so hard to accept and use sensible definitions of SO and SOA?
> 
> SO - Single Operator - station operated by single, one, operator without "ASSISTANCE" by SOMEONE ELSE via any means - be in the shack, over internet, phone, ESP, whatever....
> That means NOT someone/something else outside of own shack is gathering info on call, frequency, etc. and communicating to Single Operator. Technology in one's own shack is OK, own Skimmer at the QTH is OK. Remote, outside of own QTH "suppliers of call/freq", persons or gadgets are assistance by someone else - NOT OK!
> 
> SAO - Single Operator Assisted - station operated by single, one, operator with ASSISTANCE by Someone/Something Else outside of own shack, via any means, providing Call/Frequency info.
> 
> Normal people, SO, would do hunting on their own, with own rifle, find the bear and "nail" him. Feels good!
> 
> "Assisted" people SAO would have army of hunters, finding the bear, kill him and then yell: "come, here is the bear, kill him!" Click, gotcha!
> 
> But Hams have a problem figuring what the ASSISTANCE is. Huge discussions about - is the pencil, keyer, computer, etc. assistant?
> 
> Personally, I would like to see the "assistance" by Internet go away or be restricted to use. Just like DXing was ruined by nets, list, contesting is being poisoned by Internet spoon feeding Call/Freq. Instead of preserving pure hunting aspect, we get crazy pileups, frequency hogging, unsportsman like behavior, hunting dead bears.
> 
> Don't get me started on "rentastations" - hey, its me, in someone else's skin!
> 
> Have fun, whatever is left of it!
> 
> 73 Yuri, K3BU.us
> www.MVmanor.com
> da place for conventions, weddings, concerts,...
> 
>  
>  
>  On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Jack Haverty wrote:
>  
> 
>> So, I'd like to see a split of assisted versus unassisted based on those observations, with the following basic definitions:
>> 
>> Unassisted - a station using technology, of any kind, to communicate using only ham radio waves.  All communication across the station boundary (building, 100-meter circle, whatever) must be performed using ham radio.  Within the station boundary, other forms of communication may be used.
>> 
>> Assisted - a station using technology, of any kind, to communicate not only using radio waves, but also using other forms of communications across the station boundary for whatever purpose the operator wishes. All contact exchanges (whatever that means) must however be accomplished only by ham radio communications.
>> 
>> In other words, Unassisted means you use only ham radio; assisted means you may use other forms of communications as well.
>> 
>> 73,
>> /Jack de K3FIV
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest