[CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power

Igor Sokolov ua9cdc at gmail.com
Thu Oct 6 01:07:15 EDT 2016

May be K0HB has a correct estimate but I am afraid that amongst those aiming 
for the result the percentage is a lot higher. And it will increase after 
this discussion because they will be more confident that power cheating is 
impossible to prove.

73, Igor UA9CDC
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Gilbert" <xdavid at cis-broadband.com>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power

> <tongueincheek>
> But I thought that K0HB and others here gave testimony that less than 
> 0.01% of contesters would even think of cheating?  You make it sound like 
> it's actually a problem.
> </tongueincheek>
> On 10/5/2016 10:02 AM, Igor Sokolov wrote:
>> You say  "To establish RBN analysis as a reliable means of determining 
>> power cheating — were it even possible — would require extensive, 
>> controlled experimentation" which I read - "we do not have reliable means 
>> of determining power cheating yet". Does it mean we give up and let it 
>> blossom?
>> 73, Igor UA9CDC
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list