[CQ-Contest] R: WAE PHONE CONTEST FREQ, To be or not to be?
Lyubomir Slavov, OR2F
on8lds at gmail.com
Wed Sep 7 16:43:34 EDT 2016
Hello Sam,
there is a non-written rule, we should never expect to meet so clear as it
is pronounced :
*"WORK FIRST - WORRY LATER !"*
So, in accordance with the contest rules, you shouldn't run CQ in those
windows, but if you get someone there - do not hesitate to pounce over.
Afterwards, if the "bad boy" goes DQ or gets any other penalty as a result
of the Committee's decision - either this will not affect your result,
either it will affect the results of all his correspondents there.
And versa - if you skip any possible QSO within the mentioned segments, you
just reduce your own result :-)
Good luck !
73,
Leo / OR2F
On 7 September 2016 at 10:53, Matt IZ3EYZ - Matteo Marzilli <
iz3eyz at virgilio.it> wrote:
> Sam,
>
> it would be wise if you first check the examples you publish for your
> theories the next time.
>
> If you work YV4YC on 7127 @04.10z and HC2AO on 7106 @04.20z and get QTCs
> from them on the same QRG, it doesn't mean all their previous QSOs they
> send
> back to you through QTCs took place on that QRG as well.
>
> For example this is taken from my WAE SSB 2015 log and you can easily check
> QRGs through independent sources (ie. CLX spots):
> QSO: 7174 PH 2015-09-12 0113 IR4X 59 0018 YV4YC 59
> 002
> (came back to my CQ)
> QSO: 7065 PH 2015-09-12 0307 IR4X 59 0109 HC2AO 59
> 049
> (by spot)
>
> Of course I don't know about the other Europeans and I couldn't care less
> but my QSOs with these stations took place within the allowed contest
> segments unlike you state something else.
>
> 73
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] Per conto di
> Saulius Zalnerauskas
> Inviato: martedì 6 settembre 2016 19.41
> A: Cq-Contest
> Oggetto: [CQ-Contest] WAE PHONE CONTEST FREQ, To be or not to be?
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> To be or not to be-that is the question:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_be,_or_not_to_be
>
> This weekend another WRTC event. WAE DX Phone Contest. Very interesting and
> of course very important contest for those, who are qualyfying to be
> http://www.wrtc2018.de/index.php/en/qualification/selection-criteria-2
>
> Some Team Leaders now has guaranteed, some are with question. And this one
> can make a much difference in final tables.
>
> Let's read WAE Contest rules
> http://www.darc.de/der-club/referate/dx/contest/waedc/en/rules/ . You can
> see *SSB*: 3650-3700; 7050-7060; 7100-7130; 14100-14125; 14300-14350 kHz.
>
> Try to imagine himself if You are one of those qualifiers. Station
> (multiplier) calling CQ Contest on 7.128 kHz. Everybody working them.
> Because - station is multiplier, so everyone is cheater?
>
> Read what happen if You doing this:
> Violation of the rules of the contest or unsportsmanlike conduct will be
> deemed sufficient cause for disqualification. The decisions of the
> contest-committee are final.
>
> But we go to results and if You are cheater - You are first in the World
> http://www.dxhf.darc.de/~mydxhf/dxhfdb/urkunde/urkunde.
> php?call=px5e&jahr=20
> 15&contest=WAESSB
>
> Well my dear friends, let's take a look to my last year LOG:
> QSO: 7128 PH 2015-09-12 0002 LY5W 59 0005 PX5E 59
> 0010
> QSO: 7124 PH 2015-09-12 0003 LY5W 59 0006 PX2A 59
> 0015
> PX2A - 2nd World
> http://www.dxhf.darc.de/~mydxhf/dxhfdb/urkunde/urkunde.
> php?call=px2a&jahr=20
> 15&contest=WAESSB
> and much more, but those Brasilian stations are in IARU region 3 working
> with Europeans in IARU R1 :)
>
> Ok, let's go next:
> QSO: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0410 LY5W 59 0403 YV4YC 59
> 0011
> QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0411 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0112
> LZ5K 0043
> QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0411 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0113
> IR4X 0018
> QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0412 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0117
> DL5L 0047
> QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0412 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0119
> SK3W 0039
> QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0412 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0149
> DJ7WW 0057
> QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0412 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0200
> I2VRN 0074
> QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0413 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0201
> DJ7EO 0053
> QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0413 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0404
> F4DXW 1213
> QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0413 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0405
> DL1NKS 0132
> QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0414 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0407
> DC4A 0349
> or
> QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0420 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0259
> RT4F 0106
> QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0420 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0302
> OE6Z 0065
> QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0420 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0303
> YT9M 0018
> QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0420 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0305
> LZ5K 0082
> QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0420 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0305
> OK7M 0028
> QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0420 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0305
> UA2F 0057
> QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0420 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0306
> DL5L 0066
> QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0421 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0306
> LY9A 0039
> QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0421 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0307
> IR4X 0109
> QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0421 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0308
> EI7M 0062
> etc etc
>
> and try to calculate how many cheaters You found now from Europe. And they
> are WRTC participants.
> So where is fair play?
>
> What to do? Explain please.
>
> To be stupid and pretend that nothing is happening, or follow the rules and
> remain in last place fool Sam LY5W
> http://www.wrtc2018.de/index.php/en/qualification/
> standings-2?value=ly5w&tas
> k=callsign
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list