[CQ-Contest] CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores Posted

Mon Apr 3 13:39:06 EDT 2017

Well done in short time - tnx. Still missing the raw scores for the
WPX-RTTY. Would be nice to know. 
73s Uwe DL3BQA/DM0Y

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] Im Auftrag von
cq-contest-request at contesting.com
Gesendet: Montag, 3. April 2017 18:00
An: cq-contest at contesting.com
Betreff: CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 172, Issue 4

Send CQ-Contest mailing list submissions to
	cq-contest at contesting.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	cq-contest-request at contesting.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
	cq-contest-owner at contesting.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of CQ-Contest digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted (Terry Zivney)
   2. Re: mea culpa (Maarten van R)
   3. AREG Develops new DX Pileup Defeating Technology (Bokverket)
   4. Re: mea culpa (Mark)
   5. New Super Check Partial files available	(VER20170402)(02 APR
      2017) (Stu Phillips)
   6. Re: CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted (Trent Sampson)
   7. Re: CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted (Ria Jairam)
   8. Re: CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted (john at kk9a.com)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 15:46:38 +0000 (UTC)
From: Terry Zivney <n4tz at arrl.net>
To: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted
Message-ID: <590036630.2271257.1491147998109 at mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

 http://cqwpx.com/raw.htm?mode=ph

Please report any errors to the director at cqwpx.com so they can becorrected
during the log checking process.
Terry N4TZ,? CQ WPX Contest Director

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 16:32:00 +0000
From: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten at gmail.com>
To: cq-contest at contesting.com, sawyered at earthlink.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] mea culpa
Message-ID:
	<CABTDq8hnv0X9nq_7giM2yGm3mp1PsWn7UmbZYQikmmWFHnn2xA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Ed,

AFAIK this was about live score reporting, not about unassisted vs assisted.
Or perhaps I missed something?

Furthermore, I appreciate the unassisted category and wouldn't want to see
it disappear. I for one would love to see far more categories but that's a
whole different story all together.

73, Maarten PD2R

Op zo 2 apr. 2017 om 17:46 schreef Ed Sawyer <sawyered at earthlink.net>

> Why is it that if something is "in the name of technology" its okay to 
> force everyone to use it?
>
>
>
> Its far more speed, time, and calorie efficient to use a car than to walk.
> Would you be okay with someone saying you can no longer walk?
>
>
>
> SO Unassisted contesters harm no one.
>
>
>
> Eventually - we will be the only humans working robots.  But at least 
> we will be enjoying ourselves.
>
>
>
> 73
>
>
>
> Ed  N1UR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 18:37:26 +0200
From: "Bokverket" <info at bokverket.com>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] AREG Develops new DX Pileup Defeating Technology
Message-ID: <E4C991959D9E415E8DD6C83DF3530947 at PC1>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"

I must say that it was really an impressive bunch of advanced ham
communication techniques coming together in this remarkable development
effort. My heartfelt congrats, you people of almost the antipode from
Sweden!  I especially admired your inclusion of the RBN while focusing on
SSB signals.

Just one was missing out: The earth geothermal vibration slow-mode effect
(EGVSME-73-88), which is especially useful for opening a clear virtual
tunnel through the earth from VK to Europe and vice versa (think of all
those Eu mults that you sorely need). Do bring that in, and keep the whole
ham community posted on all future developments!

Best,

Goran/SM0DRD
Stockholm, Sweden 

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 20:20:06 +0200
From: Mark <pa5mw at home.nl>
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] mea culpa
Message-ID: <ae63b648-28e9-656d-c856-5943aa28a924 at home.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed

Very well put.
Thank you!

73
Mark PA5MW

On 1-4-2017 18:44, Ed Sawyer wrote:
> Why is it that if something is "in the name of technology" its okay to 
> force everyone to use it?
>
>   
>
> Its far more speed, time, and calorie efficient to use a car than to walk.
> Would you be okay with someone saying you can no longer walk?
>
>   
>
> SO Unassisted contesters harm no one.
>
>   
>
> Eventually - we will be the only humans working robots.  But at least 
> we will be enjoying ourselves.
>
>   
>
> 73
>
>   
>
> Ed  N1UR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 21:58:40 +0000
From: Stu Phillips <stu at k6tu.net>
To: "N1MMLoggerplus at yahoogroups.com" <N1MMLoggerplus at yahoogroups.com>,
	"writelog at contesting.com" <writelog at contesting.com>,
	"cq-contest at contesting.com" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] New Super Check Partial files available
	(VER20170402)(02 APR 2017)
Message-ID: <C1B3C0CE-36E2-4D41-9D51-A4FB62D759F3 at k6tu.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

A New release of the Super Check Partial database files is available at:

http://www.supercheckpartial.com

Calls in the MASTER.DTA file: 45,638

If you would like to contribute your CABRILLO format logs for the SCP
database, please send them at any time.

The easiest thing to do is to bcc the following email address:

           logs at supercheckpartial.com

...when you submit your log to the sponsor?s robot after each contest.  

Please DO NOT send ADIF files! 

You can send more than one log attachment in a single email BUT PLEASE DON?T
SEND THEM IN A ZIP file!

If you want to check the version of the SCP files you are using, look for a
call beginning with ?VER".  Every SCP file includes the version number in
the list of calls in the format VERYYYYMMDD.

The next release of the database will be at the beginning of May, 2017.  Any
requested changes or deletions of callsigns received by NOON PDT on May 1st,
2017 will be included in that release.  Please send requests to:

      logs at supercheckpartial.com.  

PLEASE MAKE SURE TO SEND ADD/CHANGE MESSAGES WITHOUT ATTACHED LOGS OTHERWISE
I PROBABLY WON?T SEE YOUR REQUEST due to the email processing robot.

Please let me know if you find any bad calls in the files.
Thanks again to all the contributors!
Stu K6TU

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 02:08:54 +0000
From: Trent Sampson <vk4ts at outlook.com>
To: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest at contesting.com>, Terry Zivney
	<objectiveuser at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted
Message-ID:

<DM2PR0401MB1119E2CD3668A3EF4153720BF2080 at DM2PR0401MB1119.namprd04.prod.outl
ook.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

There are some interesting scores there !!!

A Single op Single band topping the SOAB Score - when was the last time that
happened in a major contest?

Does the SOSB win SOAB?

Interesting

Trent
VK4TS
PO Box 275
Mooloolaba 4557
0408497550

________________________________
From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com> on behalf of Terry
Zivney <n4tz at arrl.net>
Sent: 03 April 2017 01:46
To: CQ-Contest Reflector
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted

http://cqwpx.com/raw.htm?mode=ph
CQ World Wide WPX Contest - Raw Scores Before
Checking<http://cqwpx.com/raw.htm?mode=ph>
cqwpx.com
Raw Scores Before Checking SSB scores not available.

Please report any errors to the director at cqwpx.com so they can becorrected
during the log checking process.
Terry N4TZ,  CQ WPX Contest Director

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
CQ-Contest Info Page - Contesting.com Ham Radio Mailing
Lists<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
lists.contesting.com
CQ-Contest at CONTESTING.COM is an electronic mail reflector dedicated to hams
interested in all types of amateur radio contesting. This is a good place
for contest ...

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 22:19:22 -0400
From: Ria Jairam <rjairam at gmail.com>
To: Trent Sampson <vk4ts at outlook.com>
Cc: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest at contesting.com>,	Terry Zivney
	<objectiveuser at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted
Message-ID:
	<CAMCyBs7hN5eHN20itmgVEHZ+HUy2gxrVndULo0vvKQNSa+8-+g at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

The single band doesn't win.

In fact, I don't even think low power scores will beat high power even if
they are in the same operator category.

Ria, N2RJ

On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Trent Sampson <vk4ts at outlook.com> wrote:

> There are some interesting scores there !!!
>
>
> A Single op Single band topping the SOAB Score - when was the last 
> time that happened in a major contest?
>
>
> Does the SOSB win SOAB?
>
>
> Interesting
>
>
>
> Trent
> VK4TS
> PO Box 275
> Mooloolaba 4557
> 0408497550
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com> on behalf of 
> Terry Zivney <n4tz at arrl.net>
> Sent: 03 April 2017 01:46
> To: CQ-Contest Reflector
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted
>
> http://cqwpx.com/raw.htm?mode=ph
> CQ World Wide WPX Contest - Raw Scores Before Checking< 
> http://cqwpx.com/raw.htm?mode=ph> cqwpx.com Raw Scores Before Checking 
> SSB scores not available.
>
>
>
>
>
> Please report any errors to the director at cqwpx.com so they can 
> becorrected during the log checking process.
> Terry N4TZ,  CQ WPX Contest Director
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> CQ-Contest Info Page - Contesting.com Ham Radio Mailing Lists< 
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
> lists.contesting.com
> CQ-Contest at CONTESTING.COM is an electronic mail reflector dedicated to 
> hams interested in all types of amateur radio contesting. This is a 
> good place for contest ...
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>

------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:27:19 -0400
From: "john at kk9a.com" <john at kk9a.com>
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted
Message-ID: <ccc1990ab918e31190d5ab48b2f5a5f5.squirrel at www11.qth.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8

Why? ABHP does not require that you run more than 100 watts or that you
operate on all bands.

John KK9A

To:	Trent Sampson <vk4ts at outlook.com>
Subject:	Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted
From:	Ria Jairam <rjairam at gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 2 Apr 2017 22:19:22 -0400

The single band doesn't win.

In fact, I don't even think low power scores will beat high power even if
they are in the same operator category.

Ria, N2RJ

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

------------------------------

End of CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 172, Issue 4
******************************************