[CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing

[Peter Voelpel]

In contrast to what I see in my public log my Cabrillo file sent is
correctly formatted with CR and LF. 

73
Peter


-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
w5ov at w5ov.com
Sent: Donnerstag, 13. April 2017 11:21
To: 'Dick Green WC1M'; 'Peter Voelpel'
Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing

Actually, Dick;

The entrants have the responsibility to be smarter about common mistakes
like that.  

Kinda like getting the callsigns right.

His error was actually even worse - the 2 additional QSOS were appended to
the last QSO in the log in one big long line.

No CR or LF.

Will this make it through email?

QSO: 21217 PH 2016-10-30 1901 DJ7WW         59  14     IR1X          59  15
0 X QSO:  3789 PH 2016-10-30 2238 DJ7WW         59  14     OE6Z          59
15     0 X QSO:  3787 PH 2016-10-30 2241 DJ7WW         59  14     E7DX

73,

de W5OV


-----Original Message-----
From: Dick Green WC1M [mailto:wc1m73 at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 1:47 AM
To: w5ov at w5ov.com; 'Peter Voelpel' <dj7ww at t-online.de>
Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing

The log checking program could be smarter about common mistakes like that.
At the very least, an "X" in column 1 without a hyphen ought to generate an
error so the person doing the log checking can make a manual correction.

73, Dick WC1M

-----Original Message-----
From: w5ov at w5ov.com [mailto:w5ov at w5ov.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 3:02 PM
To: Peter Voelpel <dj7ww at t-online.de>
Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing

Peter,

You entered them as "X QSO".  You left out the hyphen "X-QSO".

For this reason your QSOS with OE6Z and E7DX on 75 were ignored by the log
checking software.

73,

Bob Naumann W5OV
CQWW Contest Committee

See below:

QSO: 21217 PH 2016-10-30 1901 DJ7WW         59  14     IR1X          59 
15     0
X QSO:  3789 PH 2016-10-30 2238 DJ7WW         59  14     OE6Z          59
15     0
X QSO:  3787 PH 2016-10-30 2241 DJ7WW         59  14     E7DX





On Wed, April 12, 2017 5:38 am, Peter Voelpel wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
>
> What happens to the other station?
>
>
> I had two QSOs in CQWW 2016 marked with X on a different band while 
> doing  mono band. Both qsos are listed under "Stations Receiving Not 
> In Log From DJ7WW".
> Their public logs show them both.
>
>
> 73
> Peter
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf 
> Of Randy Thompson K5ZD
> Sent: Mittwoch, 12. April 2017 12:19
> To: john at kk9a.com; cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing
>
>
> The Cabrillo specification does allow for this.  See 
> https://wwrof.org/cabrillo/cabrillo-specification-v3/
>
>
> X-QSO: qso-data
> Any QSO marked with this tag will be ignored in your log. Use to mark 
> QSOs  made that you do not want to count toward your score.
>
>
> This tag was created to give people a way to mark a QSO as not 
> counting and not have to remove it from their log.
>
> Note: Not every contest may accept this tag, but it is recognized by 
> the major contests.
>
> Randy, K5ZD
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf 
>> Of  john at kk9a.com Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 2:45 AM
>> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing
>>
>>
>> Is there a way to have some unclaimed QSOs in a cabrillo file?
>>
>>
>> John KK9A
>>
>>
>> To:	cq-contest at contesting.com
>> Subject:	Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing
>> From:	"Dick Green WC1M"
>> Date:	Tue, 11 Apr 2017 15:31:33 -0400
>>
>>
>> I was advised to do that by K3EST for the 8P8P CQ WW SSB M/S log when 
>> we discovered that a bug in our logging software caused us to make a 
>> significant number of QSOs outside the 10-minute window. This was 
>> back in the days when log scrubbing wasn't as strongly discouraged as 
>> it is now. I don't know what the CQ WW CC would advise today.
>>
>>
>>
>> 73, Dick WC1M
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest