[CQ-Contest] Request to publish all calls of stations found to be breaking any rule in all contests

[W0MU Mike Fatchett]

How can you tell which violations are deliberate vs accidental? Rules 
are written so that intent is not considered.  Either you did it or you 
did not.

Why publish the calls of DQ stations did they self spot on purpose 
without knowing the rules etc.

W0MU

On 4/14/2017 8:43 AM, Ria Jairam wrote:
> I"m not sure what a hall of shame online would accomplish, but I guess 
> if you want to go zero tolerance with rules violations this would be 
> the way to go.
>
> My only stipulation is that the rules violation has to be deliberate, 
> and not accidental.
>
> 73, Ria, N2RJ
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr at comcast.net 
> <mailto:n4zr at comcast.net>> wrote:
>
>     Bravo, Mike.  Let me extend the thought a bit further. The CQWW
>     Committee needs to be transparent and specific about its criteria
>     for various actions. What warrants a warning, versus what warrants
>     a DQ? What repeated infractions from one year to the next warrant
>     a DQ?
>
>      The old yellow card/red card system was an attempt at this. 
>     Nobody is asking *how* they caught the cheaters, just what the
>     penalties are for various offenses, either current or repeated.
>     That's the only way they will get pastthe perception that they are
>     being arbitrary, favoring a particular nationality and so on.
>
>     73, Pete N4ZR
>     Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
>     at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
>     spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
>     For spots, please use your favorite
>     "retail" DX cluster.
>
>
>     On 4/13/2017 7:25 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
>
>         CQ chose only to publish stations that were Disqualified.
>
>         How about a list of all stations that were found to have
>         broken a rule(s) and the penalty for doing so.
>
>         How about a lot more transparency.
>
>         Just a thought.
>
>         W0MU
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         CQ-Contest mailing list
>         CQ-Contest at contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
>         http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>         <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     CQ-Contest mailing list
>     CQ-Contest at contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
>     http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>     <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
>
>