[CQ-Contest] Request to publish all calls of stations found to be breaking any rule in all contests

[Pete Smith N4ZR]

Please note, I said *criteria.*     It would be a simple table, like

What gets you a warning.

     1-5 solicited or self spots

1-5 10-minute rule violations

What gets you a DQ the first time.

More than 5 self-spots

     More than 5 10-minute violations

Log padding, less than 10 QSOs

What gets you a DQ for more than one year

Log padding of more than 10 QSOs

     Second op at a station entered as single op


...And so on

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.

On 4/14/2017 10:43 AM, Ria Jairam wrote:
> I"m not sure what a hall of shame online would accomplish, but I guess if
> you want to go zero tolerance with rules violations this would be the way
> to go.
>
> My only stipulation is that the rules violation has to be deliberate, and
> not accidental.
>
> 73, Ria, N2RJ
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr at comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Bravo, Mike.  Let me extend the thought a bit further. The CQWW Committee
>> needs to be transparent and specific about its criteria for various
>> actions. What warrants a warning, versus what warrants a DQ? What repeated
>> infractions from one year to the next warrant a DQ?
>>
>>   The old yellow card/red card system was an attempt at this.  Nobody is
>> asking *how* they caught the cheaters, just what the penalties are for
>> various offenses, either current or repeated. That's the only way they will
>> get pastthe perception that they are being arbitrary, favoring a particular
>> nationality and so on.
>>
>> 73, Pete N4ZR
>> Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
>> at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
>> spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
>> For spots, please use your favorite
>> "retail" DX cluster.
>>
>>
>> On 4/13/2017 7:25 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
>>
>>> CQ chose only to publish stations that were Disqualified.
>>>
>>> How about a list of all stations that were found to have broken a rule(s)
>>> and the penalty for doing so.
>>>
>>> How about a lot more transparency.
>>>
>>> Just a thought.
>>>
>>> W0MU
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>