[CQ-Contest] CQWW Assisted - Is it just another Urban Myth

[John Geiger]

"No top operator in any contest is unassisted! The moment you get spotted
by any skimmer or other Ham you get assistance!"

The top operators in the North American Sprint are by your definition still
unassisted!

73 John AF5CC

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Holger at 9h3m.com <holger at 9h3m.com> wrote:

> No top operator in any contest is unassisted! The moment you get spotted
> by any skimmer or other Ham you get assistance!
> Only because you don't use the cluster at your station does not make you
> unassisted.
>
> I would like to see this acknowledged by more organisers in combining
> assisted and unassisted classes. In my eyes not doing this is cheating
> already! Especially since it is impossible to control this.
>
> The reason why the top operators join unassisted lays in the WRTC
> qualification rules. To gain maximum points you have to enter SO
> unassisted. So the top operators are forced to use those classes. And the
> main reason for endless pile ups are not the super skills but the spotting
> assistance they get. Another driver is the status given to those classes.
> Unassisted is established as the premium over assisted. Look at the forms
> of awarding and acknowledging results. There is a tone of discrimination
> when it comes to assisted class.
>
> We down in the Pacific know exactly about the power of cluster spots as
> only after we get spotted we have runs!!! No one points antennas towards us
> otherwise. If I do unassisted I can tell when I got spotted. I can even
> tell you if it was a skimmer or dx-cluster.
>
> If you can't arrange to block unassisted claiming operators from getting
> spotted on any network you are operating assisted no matter what you claim.
> Pleas stop lying to yourself!
>
> 73 Holger- ZL3IO/ZM4T
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>