[CQ-Contest] Wireless Headphone System

[Joe]

Yup, just because it's cheaper, does NOT mean it's Junk!

The small Transmitter I bought, for the FM broadcast I bought in 1994. 
For like 5 bucks.

It plays radio when I want to as described in my infamous E-Mail, and 
99% of the time it's streaming audio from like Pandora all through my 
property.

Still running strong! 20+ years later!

Joe WB9SBD

On 12/24/2017 4:06 PM, Tom Osborne wrote:
> Been using the same old Radio Shack cordless headphones my wife bought me
> about 10 years ago.  Analog type with no latency in the audio.
>
> Just set them on the charger base when not using them and they are always
> ready to go.  She paid $29.95 for them.  Best $29.95 she ever spent on me!
> :-)
>
> They have big muffs that are real comfortable to wear.  And the best part
> is that I can take my hearing aids off and adjust the volume to where it is
> comfortable without the 'aids.  73
> Tom W7WHY
>
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Kelly Taylor <ve4xt at mymts.net> wrote:
>
>> Don’t forget: quality always costs less in the long run.
>>
>> What are the odds the cheapo unit posited has the Pin 1 problem?
>>
>> How many cheap units do you go through before you decide to do what you
>> should have done in the first place? Which is, of course, to pony up for
>> quality… For those who asked about a “quality” unit, $200 is not too much.
>>
>> 73, kelly, ve4xt,
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com