[CQ-Contest] R: Re: R: 3V8SS disqualified from WW SSB and WRTC

[.. VE5ZX]

> Because I do not want the methods of they way they are finding 
> cheaters exposed so that the cheaters can modify their behavior to 
> beat the checks.

The only way to known if a detection method is valid is for it to be 
open for public scrutiny.

This why in 2008 José, CT1BOH and I, wrote a full description of a 
technique we developed to determine if SOAB, SOAB assisted and MS CQWW 
cw logs could be differentiated from each other to confirm the class in 
which a log was entered.

http://users.sussex.ac.uk/~sylvank/pubs/2RE%20signatures.pdf

And comments about the contesting.com were encourage

http://www.contesting.com/articles/913

IMHO - Any technique that is used by any contest committee should be 
open to full scrutiny of the contest community so everyone can be 
assured that the methodology is robust.

The CQWW should be encourage to become more transparent in the methods 
they used to DQ a station


Syl - VE5ZX