[CQ-Contest] R: Re: R: 3V8SS disqualified from WW SSB and WRTC

[Ashraf Chaabane]

Chuck,

 

Correct call is : KG5OUE, Gerry copied it wrongly.

 

Gerry,

 

I didn’t say what is my IP, I don’t even know how to have it. CC said I was using that one. 

 

73

Ash

 

De : w5prchuck at gmail.com [mailto:w5prchuck at gmail.com] 
Envoyé : mercredi 22 février 2017 19:38
À : Gerry Hull; Kelly Taylor
Cc : cq-contest; Ashraf Chaabane
Objet : RE: [CQ-Contest] R: Re: R: 3V8SS disqualified from WW SSB and WRTC

 

KG5UOE is not in the FCC database.

 

Chuck W5PR

 

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>  for Windows 10

 

From: Gerry Hull <mailto:gerry at yccc.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 11:56 AM
To: Kelly Taylor <mailto:ve4xt at mymts.net> 
Cc: cq-contest <mailto:cq-contest at contesting.com> ; Ashraf Chaabane <mailto:ash.kf5eyy at gmail.com> 
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] R: Re: R: 3V8SS disqualified from WW SSB and WRTC

 

I just read Ash's post on his web page.

 

I wish Dave, K1TTT, still did his analysis of IP traffic.

 

However, with some checking on www.arin.net:

 

Committee says IP of 3V8CB and KG5UOE was 197.2.86.149.   F4HJD and these

same two cal lsigns also spotted from 197.0.251.101.

Ash says his IP was 196.176.13.62.

 

ALL of these IP addresses are from the same provider:

 

Name Generic POC

Handle GENER11-ARIN

Company AfriNIC Ltd

Street Level 11ABC

Raffles Tower

Lot 19, Cybercity

City Ebene

I doubt KG5UOE and F4HJD would be routing their traffic via this internet

supplier for Africa/Indian Ocean.

 

Also, said he was using a 3G/4G cellular provider.    None of these

providers have mobile devices having a fixed IP.

It is most certainly dynamic, assigned from a pool.

 

Is this smoking-gun evidence?   I don't know.  I'll leave that up to the

reader.   The shame is that Ash is a great op.

 

However, we must have confidence in the committee (both CQWW and WRTC).

 

73, Gerry W1VE

 

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Kelly Taylor <ve4xt at mymts.net> wrote:

 

> I think this is definitely a case for the ideal ‘Justice must not only be

> done, it must be seen to be done.’

> 

> With all due respect to the committee, from the information available, we

> cannot see justice being done here.

> 

> It is true we do not, now, know whether we are seeing everything or only

> the things Ash wants us to see, but from what we CAN see, it looks as

> though the DQ is based on flimsy grounds. Given the added consequence of

> the DQ (WRTC eligibility), it demands the highest standard of proof of

> guilt.

> 

> I have my doubts a guilty party would protest to this degree. I suggest

> the committee members owe it to themselves to be transparent on this one.

> 

> 73, kelly, ve4xt

> 

> 

> > On Feb 22, 2017, at 7:34 AM, Ashraf Chaabane <ash.kf5eyy at gmail.com>

> wrote:

> >

> > Mike, Ria and all,

> >

> > I put online the CC accusations (their native emails) and my responses:

> >

> > http://www.kf5eyy.info/3V8SS_WWSSB16_DQ.htm

> >

> > I think that allows everyone to read from both sides. Now it's up to you

> to

> > comment!

> >

> > 73

> > --

> > Ash ~ 3V8SS/KF5EYY

> > http://www.kf5eyy.info/

> > Phone/SMS: (+216) 22670026

> > Skype: kf5eyy

> > _______________________________________________

> > CQ-Contest mailing list

> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com

> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

> 

> _______________________________________________

> CQ-Contest mailing list

> CQ-Contest at contesting.com

> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

> 

_______________________________________________

CQ-Contest mailing list

CQ-Contest at contesting.com

http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest