[CQ-Contest] CQWW 2016 SSB logs now public

Steve London n2icarrl at gmail.com
Sat Jan 7 10:33:56 EST 2017


What CQWW is doing is a great idea. It's called crowd sourcing. Better 
to find out the discrepancies before the official results are published, 
than to scramble after-the-fact, as happened several years ago.

This is just part of your continuing vendetta against open logs. Just 
need to go back in the CQ-Contest archives to see this. Back then, you 
also promised to not ever submit a log.

Steve, N2IC

On 01/06/2017 08:37 PM, kzerohb at gmail.com wrote:
> Doug, this is possibly the most disturbing message that I have ever seen on this reflector.
> Essentially you, wearing your “Director of CQWW” hat, have gone out to the worldwide fraternity of Amateur Radio sportsmen and said…..
> “Hey, guys, here are the logs of everybody who played in this Amateur Radio contest.  Would you please be a good citizen and have a look to see if you can find some cheaters among your fellow hams in there.  We look forward to your result, Comrades.  Here’s a special mailbox.”
> I really wanted to help MWA in the club competition, so I sent in a small log.  Probably too small to worry you about, but have a look anyhow.  Because it’s the last one I’ll submit.
> 73, de Hans, KØHB
> "Just a boy and his radio"™
> From: kr2q at optimum.net
> Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2017 2:09 AM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 2016 SSB logs now public
> Please see http://cqww.com/publiclogs/2016ph/
> For the last two years, the contest community has used the public logs to assist the CQWW Contest Committee in finding possible “issues” with some of the logs.  We look forward to your feedback again this year.
> You may send your findings and concerns to: questions at cqww.com
> Please base your findings and concerns on an actual log review and not simply on your suspicions.
> Thank you!

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list