[CQ-Contest] Accck ..Mistake CQWW 160

Stephen Bloom sbloom at acsalaska.net
Sat Jan 28 19:17:44 EST 2017

Several people worked me a second time, after I had posted that (speaking of
..."Would that count as assisted").  If possible, that's probably the safest

Steve KL7SB

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
john at kk9a.com
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 8:26 AM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Accck ..Mistake CQWW 160

This is another case of should you log what was sent or what is correct.
Committee members typically say to log was is sent even if obviously
incorrect. I did this in CQWW RTTY when a zone sent was obviously incorrect
since it did not match the state and I am waiting to see what happens.

John KK9A

To:	cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject:	[CQ-Contest] Accck ..Mistake CQWW 160
From:	sbloom at acsalaska.net
Date:	Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:32:05 -0900
<cq-contest at contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest at contesting.com>
Hey all:
First time in this contest ..just realized I've been sending the wrong
exchange!!  AK is DX for this one.  I've been sending the serial number
instead of the zone.  I assume most knew that ...but just in case .. 
If you were one of my Qs before 0300Z January 28th, the exchange should have

been 599 1.  
Sorry for any problem!
Steve KL7SB

CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list