[CQ-Contest] CQWW Assisted - Is it just another Urban Myth ?

[Joe]

This would be an interesting thing to test say in a future WRTC,
have say half run assisted and the other half not.

Might be interesting,

Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 7/31/2017 8:29 AM, 4O3A Signature wrote:
> Hi Tent,
>
> It is simple reason for it.
> SOAB is still category where most of serious contesters are.
> Assisted is somehow marginal and not that attractive as unassisted.
> Sure that assisted category will generate higher score. MJ, BOH, TV.. will
> make higher score in unassisted than some others in assisted simply because
> they are better.
>
> 73
> Ranko
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 31, 2017 16:18, "Trent Sampson" <vk4ts at outlook.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry Stan
>
> But the statistics do not support your biased view - Plain and simple -
> Troll through ALL the results and let us know how many times ASSISTED beat
> UNASSITED - the answer will highlight your biased response
>
> Cheers
>
> VK4TS
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stan Stockton [mailto:wa5rtg at gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, 31 July 2017 11:11 PM
> To: Trent Sampson
> Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Assisted - Is it just another Urban Myth ?
>
> Here we go again.
>
> The answer to your question has zero relevance on whether they should be
> combined.
>
> Do the results show  being assisted is a detriment like QRP is a detriment
> as compared to low power. If so, it's like me saying that QRP scores don't
> beat low power scores so why not combine those categories.
>
> If anyone thinks that SO scores would not be as good if those top operators
> used the internet to provide them a list of multipliers to work, they have
> no clue.  If a survey was taken of those who operate SO in serious fashion
> the result would be they don't want them combined.
>
> I have yet to see any logical reason to eliminate the category other than
> it is difficult to enforce the rules.
>
> 73... Stan, K5GO
>
>
>
> Sent from Stan's IPhone
>
>
>
>> On Jul 31, 2017, at 6:26 AM, Trent Sampson <vk4ts at outlook.com> wrote:
>>
>> The Assisted category in the CQWW is 25 years old this year;
>>
>> It was created because of the advantages" given to operators who were
> using the spotter networks
>> In all of the 25 years of assisted categories in the CQWW how many times
> has the world SOAB (Assisted) beaten the SOAB (Unassisted) ? - It is a
> trick question
>> Based on factual information is there any reason to not combine the
> categories ? before you answer look at the data...
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>