[CQ-Contest] Attention CQWW SO2R Competitors
Stan Stockton
wa5rtg at gmail.com
Wed Jun 28 19:20:44 EDT 2017
"as heard by the operator" are the key words.
If you don't have the sideline on, you don't hear it on CW. You think they want you to set up a microphone to record everything you say during contest?
Surely they don't want you to have monitor on while transmitting on SSB!
Stan, K5GO
> On Jun 28, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Steve
>
> actually the transmitted signal must be present on the recording
>
> *C. Audio Recordings:* Any single operator entrant (see V.A.1) competing
> for a top three finish at the (a) World, (b) Continent, or (c) USA levels,
> must record the transmitted and received audio as heard by the operator for
> the duration of the contest operation.
>
> So if will be a change would be nice to know about that, many people
> working on this, big companies like Elecfart are working on a firmware to
> improve that and make it easy for the simple operator to do the recording
> that cqww cc ask for
>
> 73,
> Jorge
> CX6VM/CW5W
>
> 2017-06-28 11:06 GMT-03:00 Steve London <n2icarrl at gmail.com>:
>
>> If you are not a single-op, SO2R competitor, you can probably delete this
>> message...
>>
>> The current CQWW rules regarding recording of the contest by top
>> competitors states:
>>
>> "Any single operator entrant (see V.A.1) competing for a top three finish
>> at the (a) World, (b) Continent, or (c) USA levels, must record the
>> transmitted and received audio as heard by the operator for the duration of
>> the contest operation."
>>
>> Note the phrase "received audio as heard by the operator".
>>
>> I have always followed this rule, splitting my headphone audio between my
>> headphones and my recording device. When doing SO2R, this means that my
>> transmitted signal is often not present in the recording - the recording
>> contains exactly the audio I am hearing. According to the former CQWW
>> director, who wrote the rule, I have been following both the wording and
>> intent of the rule. If the CQWW committee needed to hear my transmitted
>> signal, they had access to full-band, SDR recordings made by independent,
>> third parties.
>>
>> I have it on good authority that the current CQWW triumvirate may be
>> planning a change to this rule to require that the transmitted signal be
>> present on the recording, regardless of whether the operator was listening
>> to the transmitted signal. If you feel as I do, that the current rule
>> should not be changed, I urge you to make your opinions known to the
>> current CQWW triumvirate - KR2Q, W4PA, W5OV.
>>
>> Please feel free to forward this e-mail to others who may be affected.
>>
>> 73,
>> Steve, N2IC
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
> --
> 73,
> Jorge
> CX6VM/CW5W
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list