[CQ-Contest] CX2DK DQ

[Ria Jairam]

I don't really see the logic in this.

I thought the idea was to keep how the contest committee is finding
cheaters private?

Ria
N2RJ

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Jamie WW3S <ww3s at zoominternet.net> wrote:

> but he didn’t enter a check log, he entered as a participant.......even
> though it got reclassified, it SHOULD be public......
>
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Steve London
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 11:28 AM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK DQ
>
>
> That will not happen. Check logs are not made public.
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
>
> On 03/06/2017 03:03 PM, Jamie WW3S wrote:
>
>> Maybe the infamous " crowd sourcing" from the last kerfuffle will resolve
>> this, once the logs are made public.....
>>
>> On Mar 6, 2017 9:12 AM, James Cain <jamesdavidcain at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Keeping suspicions private is a good thing. The more the CC reveals, the
>>>> more info cheaters have to stay one step ahead and circumvent the
>>>> ules."  --  W2UP
>>>>
>>>
>>> Better to let nine guilty people go free than to execute one innocent
>>> person.  --  K1TN
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7998 / Virus Database: 4756/14073 - Release Date: 03/07/17
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>