[CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC

[Ria Jairam]

My comment was aimed more at "we have to merge SO/SOA so cheaters can't
cheat."

There was cheating some years ago where a "SO2R" operator was actually
suspected to actually have a 2nd operator and reclassified/DQed (can't
remember which). So to eliminate this, we should take the incentive to
cheat away by segregating SO2R into multiop.

Of course, that won't happen.

But I hear the drumbeat of "We have to merge, we have to merge, cheaters
are coming!" and I don't like it one bit,

Things sound ridiculous when we take them to extremes.

We don't notice until our way of operating is affected.

Ria
N2RJ


On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Ed Sawyer <sawyered at earthlink.net> wrote:

>
> SO2R has nothing to do with fairness any more than have a 4 sq in a salt
> marsh on 160 is fair vs the rest of the competing world using inv Ls or
> dipoles or verticals over normal soil.
>
>
>
> When someone lies about using assistance to gain an unfair advantage, that
> is just plain cheating.  Mushing SO2R and lieing serves no purpose and is
> uncalled for.
>
>
>
> 73
>
>
>
> Ed  N1UR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>