[CQ-Contest] QSY

[W0MU Mike Fatchett]

Ed,

That is what the thread started out as.  A discussion about what was 
observed and devolved from there.

This list is to discuss contesting right?  I think that is what happened.

A point was made and then myself and a number of people said to contact 
the appropriate ARRL folks and express your opinion which ever way you like.

I made a comment or two too many as did others.  My apologies for that.

But I think the word got out and the reflector served its purpose.

W0MU


On 3/23/2017 6:48 AM, Ed Sawyer wrote:
> I think that the strong opinions and emotion should be directed to getting
> the rules changed, or not, by the contest sponsors.  Not going after people
> recognizing the rules and using them to their advantage.  After all, the
> very popular Multi-Single Category and the multi operators on the same band
> in Multi-2 and Multi-Multi all started this same way.  So did SO2R.  All
> very strict interpretations of the rules.  Single transmitted signal on a
> band at any one time.
>
>   
>
> The "transmitter" and "adjusting equipment and antennas" clauses in ARRL HF
> contests can be equally reviewed.  But until they are changed, they are the
> rules.
>
>   
>
> If the particular sponsor (in this case the ARRL) considers the contest
> rules important, they should have no problem considering this case.
>
>   
>
> 73
>
>   
>
> Ed  N1UR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest