[CQ-Contest] Cutting edges and cutting corners

Steve Lott lottsphoto at gmail.com
Mon Mar 27 14:41:54 EDT 2017


Art,

It is GOOD for those that are entering in the Assisted category

yes,  it is a techniques that is perfected
by practice

Are you complaining or just making a point ?

I try to view things with the approach that the glass is half full

steve
KG5VK


http://www.KG5VK.com
My Ham Radio Friends


On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Radio K0HB <kzerohb at gmail.com> wrote:

> Good post, Art.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 13:26 Art Boyars <artboyars at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Among the many posts about interleaved CQs and about spotting and RBN
> > packet, this quote represents several:
> >
> > "We can criticize the RBN and packet but used properly by skilled
> operators
> > it is a valuable tool."
> >
> > Well, yes.  But valuable for what?  Only for this new form of contesting
> > that we Tune-For-QSO op's think is getting too far away from what (HF)
> > RADIO contesting is supposed to be about.
> >
> > Does it take (different) skills to use them effectively?  You betcha.  So
> > what?
> >
> > (Which is easier to play: the piano or the violin?  Answer: No.  It might
> > be easier to get out your first notes with the piano, but achieving
> > excellence is equally difficult.  By definition.)
> >
> > It would also take some new skills to use a system in which:
> >
> >   -- You hear a signal, that's a little too weak to copy...
> >       but you get part of the call
> >   -- Your SCP database figures out possible matches
> >   -- Your real-time propagation analyzing software
> >       figures out which of the matches
> >       might actually be coming through,
> >   -- and makes a temporary network connection
> >       with those guys, asking, "Are you calling me?"
> >   -- Your software accepts only negative replies,
> >       so you are not being told who IS calling,
> >       only who is NOT calling.
> >   -- The not-callers are deleted from the SCP matches.
> >   --  You need fewer repeats to log the QSO
> >
> > I dearly hope none of you think THAT counts as making QSOs by radio.  So,
> > now ... how close shall we allow?
> >
> > 73, Art K3KU
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> --
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> --
> "Just a boy and his radio"™
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list