[CQ-Contest] Flex radios

Joe nss at mwt.net
Mon May 22 16:09:03 EDT 2017


This is quite interesting.
Makes me think what are people kin K9CT doing and others that are using 
flex's
that this one Field Day site did not do when I got this comment a while ago,


There is a case from a Colorado Field Day operation where a Flex 6300 
had to be removed and was replaced by an IC-706MkIIG!  See attached 
PDF.   The 6300 has no front end at all other than a high pass at 1.7 
MHz and a low pass at 55 MHz.

Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 5/22/2017 1:18 PM, Chuck Dietz wrote:
> http://www.flexradio.com/amateur-products/flex-6000-signature-series/flex-6700/
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:38 PM, <w5prchuck at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> They are still selling the 6700
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
>> Windows 10
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Ria Jairam <rjairam at gmail.com>
>> *Sent: *Monday, May 22, 2017 12:37 PM
>> *To: *xaxaxaxa yayayaya <cqtestk4xs at aol.com>
>> *Cc: *CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest at contesting.com>
>> *Subject: *Re: [CQ-Contest] Flex radios
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Bill,
>>
>>
>>
>> The 6500 is a discontinued model. It is replaced by the 6600.
>>
>>
>>
>> The 6600 will do SO2R in a single box and has the new preselectors with
>>
>> 50dB of isolation between SCUs (an SCU is a flex term for a wideband
>>
>> receiver).
>>
>>
>>
>> As for comparing it to a K3S, that's a holy war you want to start here. :)
>>
>> However on the Maestro or M series radios the display is larger, the knobs
>>
>> are larger (on Maestro) and it has the panadapter built in. But I think
>>
>> everything else is a matter of personal preference because the performance
>>
>> is so high between those radios that to the average operator with the
>>
>> average set of ears any difference is minor.
>>
>>
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Ria, N2RJ
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Bill via CQ-Contest <
>>
>> cq-contest at contesting.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> At the hamfest last weekend I had some extra time Sunday and wandered
>> over
>>
>>> to the Flex radio site. and had a long sit down with one of the reps.  I
>>> did a hands on with the 6500  and was truly impressed, especially with
>> how
>>
>>> "easy" it was on the ears.
>>> I currently have a pair of K-3s for SO2R and have kicked around replacing
>>> these with the 6500.  I know K9CT as well as a couple others who use the
>>> Flex stuff.  I really would like to hear from them and others about these
>>> radios and how they compare to the K-3s in a contesting and Dxing
>>> situation...ease of use, operator friendly, audio quality for listening
>> as
>>
>>> well as transmit etc.  Any comments would be greatly appreciated.
>>> Bill K4XS/KH7XS
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list