[CQ-Contest] So Sunday Sucked?

[Zack Widup]

I guess most people started at contest start and were done in 24
hours? I had very few hours to operate; I thought I'd get a
significant number of QSO's during the last couple hours. I heard
nothing on 20 meters or above and only a handful of stations on 40.
They were much weaker than Saturday night around 0500Z. I thought my
antenna had fallen down.

At least I got to make 30 QSO's. I've missed the last couple years
because I couldn't determine how or where to put an antenna at my new
QTH. I finally got a vertical put up.

73, Zack W9SZ

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Jim Stahl via CQ-Contest
<cq-contest at contesting.com> wrote:
> For all who stuck it out to the bitter end in SS, it is clear that it is time for a rules update for ARRL contests, specifically doing away with general rules 3.3 and 3.5:
>
>
> 3.3.An operator may not use more than one call sign from any given location during the contest period.
>
> 3.5.A transmitter used to contact one or more stations may not be subsequently used under any other call during the contest period, except for family stations where more than one call has been issued, and then only if the second call sign is used by a different operator. (The intent of this rule is to accommodate family members who must share a rig and to prohibit manufactured or artificial contacts.)
> ------------------------
>
> As many of you are aware, for many years I’ve been doing “Single Operator Multi Station” efforts in SS, typically operating from four different stations in an effort to turn SS into a 24 hour ratefest. Now that I’m a Florida snowbird, that has been reduced to two efforts, this year a QRP effort as K8MR with the KX3 from a waterfront parking area, and a LP effort with the K3 from the condo as W3USA.
>
> It was a lot more fun to be working people in the second effort from W3USA who I had previously worked from K8MR. I’m sure nobody was bothered that I gave them an extra QSO by using two stations.
>
> My take is that these rules were put in many years ago to prevent “manufactured” contacts by friends, fellow club members or whoever. In the days of paper logs that may have made sense. But with today’s log checking it is a lot easier to find suspicious manufactured contacts. Even though a person “ manufacturing” a few QSOs is not likely to send in a log of those QSOs.
>
> Some reasonable limits might be in order, such as a minimum off time from a previous call before it could be used again, or even not allowing any return to using a previous call. But if a few hundred people were to decide on Sunday afternoon (or whenever) to fire up their stations with a new call, and have fun running some good rates while giving the full time folks new people somebody to work, would anybody really mind?
>
>
> 73  -  Jim   K8MR
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br />
<table style="border-top: 1px solid #D3D4DE;">
	<tr>
        <td style="width: 55px; padding-top: 13px;"><a
href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon"
target="_blank"><img
src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif"
alt="" width="46" height="29" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;"
/></a></td>
		<td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 12px; color: #41424e;
font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
line-height: 18px;">Virus-free. <a
href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link"
target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avast.com</a>
		</td>
	</tr>
</table><a href="#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1"
height="1"></a></div>