[CQ-Contest] Check In SS

[W0MU Mike Fatchett]

This discussion has been going on now for what as long at the CQ-Contest 
reflector has been around and yet most people still send their check right.

Just copy what is sent and move on.  The data sent and received has no 
meaning.  It is an arbitrary part of the exchange.  Why not make it your 
grid square.  Then it can't change and would go along well with the new 
ARRL operating event for next year...............Grid squares worked!

W0MU


On 11/8/2017 5:17 PM, Mike/W5JR wrote:
> Sounds like everyone is going to be sending "55" next year.
>
> tnx
> Mike / W5JR
> Alpharetta GA
>
> sent via my HP95LX
>
>> On Nov 8, 2017, at 2:37 PM, John Geiger <af5cc2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> What is the point of the ARRL stating in the rules that the check is the
>> year first licensed, if they really don't care what you send?
>>
>> 73 John AF5CC
>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:51 AM, W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu at w0mu.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think most people try to use their actual year licensed.
>>>
>>> That would be a good question to ask on the entry form.   What year were
>>> you licensed.  It think we all know that new hams are hard to come by and
>>> many are not interested in contesting.
>>>
>>> W0MU
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 11/7/2017 1:54 PM, ShelbyK4WW wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Why are so many putting so much emphasis on the CK, as anything more than
>>>> a
>>>> "randomly chosen two digit number that is consistently used throughout the
>>>> contest", having absolutely no relation to anything? ARRL has indicated it
>>>> will not enforce the CK as being "The last 2 digits of the year of first
>>>> license for either the operator or the station", and many have indicated
>>>> that they change their CK, from year to year? It certainly has little, if
>>>> any, bearing on when they were licensed?
>>>> As far as CW speed is concerned, when I call another station, I feel
>>>> obligated to try and match their speed. Sometimes this requires me to
>>>> listen to several contacts, before calling. I expect, and usually receive,
>>>> the same consideration, when I'm called? I fail to see any logic to
>>>> calling
>>>> at a much higher speed, then having to endure several repeats?
>>>>
>>>> In it to win it? Not a chance
>>>> In it to have fun? Most definitely
>>>>
>>>> 73, Shelby - K4WW
>>>> As I don't have an iPad nor iPhone, sent from my PC
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest