[CQ-Contest] An alternate SS CW re-invigoration plan

Barry Merrill w5gn at mxg.com
Tue Nov 28 12:06:20 EST 2017


Au Contraire, KA5PQD/N made 970 Qs in the 1999 10M contest,
and 1200 or more in subsequent years, and all of those Qs
were above 28.100, and before packet!

Barry, W5GN

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of W0MU Mike Fatchett
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 10:04 AM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] An alternate SS CW re-invigoration plan

In the 10m contest novices and tech were worth 5 or 10 points.  I don't think it mattered too much though.


On 11/28/2017 7:39 AM, Richard F. DiDonna wrote:
> The ARRL SS CW discussion has died down now that we're a good few 
> weeks past CW Sweeps.  Nobody has commented on the huge number of '14, 
> '15, '16, and '17 checks in the phone Sweeps.
>
> Others have in the past rued the demise of the Novice Roundup. So, why 
> not combine the both?
>
> Recommendation for the flag pole saluters: permit hams who have a 
> check within three years of the year of the running of Sweeps to 
> operate Sweeps and allow 1.5x or 2.0x points for QSOs with stations 
> whose check is within three years of the year's running of Sweeps - CW 
> only.
>
> Stations who have been licensed longer than three years and submit a 
> log with a check within the three year window get DQed. Maybe this 
> would help generate a little activity?
>
> IIRC, the ARRL 10 meter contest used to do this for Novices and Techs 
> some years ago.
>
> 73 Rich NN3W
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list