[CQ-Contest] ARRL SS SSB

Sun Apr 8 17:35:10 EDT 2018

Remember what we learned from previous Sweepstakes and check discussions on
this list.  The check is just some 2 digit number you make up, so you can't
read much into your data.  Some numbers are easier to transmit than others.

73 John AF5CC

On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 8:50 AM, rjairam at gmail.com <rjairam at gmail.com> wrote:

> My general feeling is that ham radio peaked in several periods and the
> interest was retained among those who were there during the peaks. Others
> just fell off.
>
> So your survey of checks reflects that.
>
> 73
> Ria
> N2RJ
>
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 9:17 AM Joe <nss at mwt.net> wrote:
>
> > Kind of looking at the log from last november antuicipating the results
> > any day now. But something I noticed was interesting on the CK Numbers
> > we worked. And how many,, Check this out.
> >
> > Sweepstakes Checks
> > Check  QSOs    Pct
> > ----------------------
> >    00     9     1.6
> >    01     2     0.4
> >    02     6     1.1
> >    03     4     0.7
> >    04     3     0.5
> >    05     2     0.4
> >    06     2     0.4
> >    07     3     0.5
> >    08     4     0.7
> >    09     3     0.5
> >    10     2     0.4
> >    11     3     0.5
> >    12     4     0.7
> >    13     7     1.2
> >    14     5     0.9
> >    15     8     1.4
> >    16     9     1.6
> >    17     6     1.1
> >    18     0     0.0
> >    19     0     0.0
> >    20     0     0.0
> >    21     0     0.0
> >    22     0     0.0
> >    23     0     0.0
> >    24     1     0.2
> >    25     0     0.0
> >    26     0     0.0
> >    27     0     0.0
> >    28     0     0.0
> >    29     0     0.0
> >    30     1     0.2
> >    31     2     0.4
> >    32     1     0.2
> >    33     1     0.2
> >    34     0     0.0
> >    35     0     0.0
> >    36     0     0.0
> >    37     0     0.0
> >    38     0     0.0
> >    39     0     0.0
> >    40     1     0.2
> >    41     0     0.0
> >    42     0     0.0
> >    43     0     0.0
> >    44     0     0.0
> >    45     0     0.0
> >    46     0     0.0
> >    47     2     0.4
> >    48     3     0.5
> >    49     1     0.2
> >    50     0     0.0
> >    51     1     0.2
> >    52     6     1.1
> >    53     4     0.7
> >    54     7     1.2
> >    55     7     1.2
> >    56     6     1.1
> >    57     9     1.6
> >    58     8     1.4
> >    59    20     3.5
> >    60    16     2.8
> >    61    19     3.4
> >    62    20     3.5
> >    63    19     3.4
> >    64    12     2.1
> >    65    13     2.3
> >    66    12     2.1
> >    67    16     2.8
> >    68    12     2.1
> >    69    17     3.0
> >    70    13     2.3
> >    71    11     1.9
> >    72    10     1.8
> >    73    13     2.3
> >    74     9     1.6
> >    75    11     1.9
> >    76    24     4.2
> >    77    16     2.8
> >    78     9     1.6
> >    79    11     1.9
> >    80     4     0.7
> >    81     5     0.9
> >    82     3     0.5
> >    83     8     1.4
> >    84     4     0.7
> >    85     4     0.7
> >    86     6     1.1
> >    87     7     1.2
> >    88     2     0.4
> >    89    11     1.9
> >    90     7     1.2
> >    91    15     2.7
> >    92     7     1.2
> >    93     6     1.1
> >    94     4     0.7
> >    95     5     0.9
> >    96     8     1.4
> >    97     4     0.7
> >    98     5     0.9
> >    99     5     0.9
> >
> > Everything is in the single digits till 1958/59 What happened then? WOW!
> > and then in 1980 it fell apart again.
> >
> > what changed on those dates?
> >
> > Joe WB9SBD
> > --
> > Sig
> > The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> > Idle Tyme
> > Idle-Tyme.com
> > http://www.idle-tyme.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>