[CQ-Contest] My FT8 totals: Not what I thought it would be.
Mats Strandberg
sm6lrr at gmail.com
Sat Dec 22 19:46:11 EST 2018
Yuri, I was indeed wondering the same... ;)
73 de RM2D, Mats
On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 at 23:11, Yuri <ve3dz at rigexpert.net> wrote:
> Am I subscribed to the wrong reflector? :-)
>
> Yuri VE3DZ
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> DXer
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 9:09 PM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] My FT8 totals: Not what I thought it would be.
>
> Here is the scenario:
>
> 1) FT8 user since day 1;
> 2) No FT8 robots ever used;
> 3) Maximum power used is 75 Watts, on 80M only;
> 4) Antenna is a Hustler 6BTV at ground level, no radials;
> 5) Time spent on the radio is only what a normal, responsible family man,
> following a healthy/balanced lifestyle would spend.
>
> Total entities confirmed: 68...yes, sixty eight. I thought I had a lot
> more.
>
> I'm sure a number of entities would not have been worked/confirmed using
> other modes. This is still far from the end of the hobby as we know it, or
> the banalization of DXCC.
>
> It does not appear, based on this sample of only one user, that FT8 is
> responsible for any undue advantage in favor of the little pistol, to the
> detriment of the more accomplished DXer/Contester.
>
> It would be great if others could post their FT8 totals for comparison.
>
> 73 de Vince, VA3VF
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list