[CQ-Contest] CQWW Contest Committee comments on audio recordings (was MM3AWD)

[Barry]

The casual contester doesn't care about any of this because it doesn't 
affect them.  It's a good thing to call out the bad apples.

Once again, the CQ Contest Committee did a top notch job improving the 
integrity of the game.  What we don't want or need is our radiosport 
turning into a farce of a competition like bicycle racing, with their 
doping and hidden eletric motors (to which they continue to turn a blind 
eye).

Barry W2UP

On 2/5/2018 3:35 PM, Kelly Taylor wrote:
> This constant kvetching can’t be good for contesting. It certainly does nothing to make me fret about spending more time on archery than on the radio.
>
> Go have your stringently enforced contests. I don’t care anymore. I’m sure more people are getting closer to saying ‘Screw contesting’ altogether. In fact, I’m unsubscribing from this cesspool of hatred and anger anyway.
>
> 73, kelly, ve4xt
>
>> On Feb 5, 2018, at 10:50 AM, Jim Brown <k9yc at audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/4/2018 8:42 PM, Kelly Taylor wrote:
>>> I think if anything, the lesson here is the value of transparency. Announcing DQs (or administrative check logs) but trying to keep the reasons private just raises suspicion.
>> WRONG -- it also gives cheaters clues about what things they do can be detected, and, what cannot.
>>
>> 73, Jim K9YC
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest