[CQ-Contest] QST Contest Results

Jim Brown k9yc at audiosystemsgroup.com
Mon Aug 26 15:22:15 EDT 2019

Previous message (by thread): [CQ-Contest] QST Contest Results
Next message (by thread): [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Contest in QST donovanf at starpower.net donovanf at starpower.net Mon Aug 26 14:23:14 EDT 2019 Previous message (by thread): ARRL DX CW Contest in QST Next message (by thread): ARRL DX CW Contest in QST Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] The DX Contest results article in September QST (now available via the ARRL homepage) is just as awful. Someone at ARRL HQ needs to undertake a serious review of how contest results are reported in QST. IMHO contest results articles should not be directed at the committed contester audience, every one of us knows where to look for the on-line results. The articles should be written to attract the interest of the not-yet-committed. 73 Frank W3LPL
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 8/26/2019 10:46 AM, Drew Vonada-Smith wrote:
> The focus is on numbers, not quality.

Last I heard, QST was run by magazine people.

73, Jim K9YC

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list