[CQ-Contest] possible changes for CQ VHF Contest
EdwardS at sbelectronics.com
Wed Jul 24 10:08:02 EDT 2019
Chris, As I mentioned privately to Ria. Clublog states to not draw any conclusions about overall activity vs their uploaded logs. My personal tests have shown that FT8 is very much over-represented by FT8. I base that on CQing and seeing how many of the responders are CLublog uploaders as well as scanning the band and recording the same. Surprisingly, only 25% were showing up on Clublog. I would venture to guess 90% of FT8 activity is showing up on clublog (it’s a guess only).
Tune around and do your own research. I did. And the answers made more sense.
From: Chris Plumblee [mailto:chris.plumblee at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2019 9:59 AM
To: Edward Sawyer
Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] possible changes for CQ VHF Contest
Clublog statistics support (approximately) that ratio of FT8 to CW + SSB + RTTY and other digital qsos. I was also surprised.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 8:28 AM Edward Sawyer <EdwardS at sbelectronics.com<mailto:EdwardS at sbelectronics.com>> wrote:
"70% of ham traffic is now FT8."
I am curious where this datapoint is coming from?
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
More information about the CQ-Contest