[CQ-Contest] Fwd: [wsjtgroup] WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc6

Paul O'Kane pokane at ei5di.com
Mon Jun 3 05:06:54 EDT 2019


Great - we have yet another data mode.  There is no single data mode that is
"best" in all respects.  It's always a compromise between time, signal rate,
bandwidth and number of discrete channels or tones - the potential 
combinations
are limitless.

What all data modes (including RTTY) have in common is that they require
machine decoding.  It seems to me that ham-radio contesters do their own
decoding, whether it's CW or Phone.  Everything else is data processing and,
increasingly, fully-automated data processing.

Let's leave data modes to the Data-Processing-over-RF apps.

73,
Paul EI5DI




On 02/06/2019 19:49, Jim Brown wrote:
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: [wsjtgroup] WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc6
> Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2019 14:32:20 -0400
> From: Joe Taylor joe at Princeton.EDU [wsjtgroup] 
> <wsjtgroup-noreply at yahoogroups.com>
> Reply-To: Joe Taylor <joe at Princeton.EDU>
> To: wsjtgroup at yahoogroups.com <wsjtgroup at yahoogroups.com>
>
> To:   Users of WSJT-X -- especially those interested in radio contesting
> From: WSJT Development Group
>
> As you know, we have been developing a protocol called FT4 for use in 
> radio contesting.  A new version of FT4 is now available for testing 
> in WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc6.
>
> PLEASE NOTE THAT FT4 IN RELEASE CANDIDATE 6 IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH 
> THAT IN ANY PREVIOUS RELEASE.
>
> Therefore: Please stop using WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc5.  If you wish to use FT4 
> after today or to take advantage of other recent program corrections 
> or enhancements, you should use WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc6.




More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list