[CQ-Contest] e: Fwd: [wsjtgroup] WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc6

[donovanf at starpower.net]

Zack is correct and Roger's historical knowledge needs a little work. 


This is an image of Morse's original 1844 paper tape on display in the Smithsonian: 


http://ids.si.edu/ids/deliveryService?id=NMAH-2006-10282 



Roger, this is a good place to start. The paper tape embossing instrument 
used during Morse's Washington-Baltimore two way demonstration is 
shown in the article. It was very noisy! 


http://time.com/4307892/samuel-morse-telegraph-histor y 


73 
Frank 
W3LPL 





----- Original Message -----

From: "Roger Parsons via CQ-Contest" <cq-contest at contesting.com> 
To: "Contest" <cq-contest at contesting.com>, "w9sz zack" <w9sz.zack at gmail.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 2:21:19 PM 
Subject: [CQ-Contest] e: Fwd: [wsjtgroup] WSJT-X 2.1.0-rc6 

Zack, W9SZ wrote: 

"The original Morse telegraph (and others) worked by imprinting the dots and 
dashes on a paper tape and then decoded by reading it. Imagine doing a 
contest that way! Then someone figured out that it was faster to learn to 
decode the messages by ear." 

I have no horse in the WSJT race, but just a little historical comment: 

The original telegraph using paper tape used an undulator. (This is a moving ink nozzle that will move up and down in response to the received signal. So there is a continuous print.) Having had to learn to read undulator tape (both Morse and cable code) at the end of an era, I can confidently say that it was possible to easily read either at 100 wpm. I think that audio reading (tone or clicks) came about because of (1) the cost and maintenance levels required for undulators at small stations and (2) undulators did not work at all well on early radio receivers. 

73 Roger 
VE3ZI 
_______________________________________________ 
CQ-Contest mailing list 
CQ-Contest at contesting.com 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest