[CQ-Contest] FT4 - Robotic Contesting

[Jukka Klemola]

Nah.
Ski Jumping by MS XBox or Nintendo Wii is so much better than any real life
motorized and dangerous equipment.


73,
Jukka OH6LI


pe 3. toukok. 2019 klo 21.53 K5WA (k5wa at comcast.net) kirjoitti:

> And I could win Olympic ski jumping with a helicopter…technology
> progresses on, right?  Apples to apples OM.
>
>
>
> From: Sterling Mann <kawfey at gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 3, 2019 12:24 PM
> To: K5WA <k5wa at comcast.net>
> Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 - Robotic Contesting
>
>
>
> Bob,
>
>
>
> That is true, but I think it's irrelevant. If our human brains could copy
> FT4 (and RTTY for that matter), it'd be an apples to apples comparison to
> CW and phone. But we cannot. It is apples to oranges. But that doesn't stop
> us from competition against each other in an FT4 contest.
>
>
>
> Technology progresses humanity to give us ability beyond that of the
> human, and technology progresses in amateur radio are no different. That's
> my point.
>
>
>
>
>
> -Sterling N0SSC
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 12:13 PM K5WA <k5wa at comcast.net <mailto:
> k5wa at comcast.net> > wrote:
>
>
>
> Sterling,
>
>
>
> Your argument would carry a lot more water if you had the skill to copy FT4
> in your head.
>
>
>
> Bob K5WA
>
>
>
>
>
> Message: 6
>
> Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 20:01:53 -0500
>
> From: Sterling Mann <kawfey at gmail.com <mailto:kawfey at gmail.com>  <mailto:
> kawfey at gmail.com <mailto:kawfey at gmail.com> > >
>
> To: Mike Smith VE9AA <ve9aa at nbnet.nb.ca <mailto:ve9aa at nbnet.nb.ca>
> <mailto:ve9aa at nbnet.nb.ca <mailto:ve9aa at nbnet.nb.ca> > >
>
> Cc: "CQ-Contest at contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> <mailto:CQ-Contest at contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest at contesting.com> > "
> <cq-contest at contesting.com <mailto:cq-contest at contesting.com>  <mailto:
> cq-contest at contesting.com <mailto:cq-contest at contesting.com> > >
>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 - Robotic Contesting
>
> Message-ID:
>
>
> <CACxCfFo7n6uH7=M0C3_ciOvsHkDsXiUSCHkFo7bvxsAqD3kh4w at mail.gmail.com
> <mailto:M0C3_ciOvsHkDsXiUSCHkFo7bvxsAqD3kh4w at mail.gmail.com>
> <mailto:CACxCfFo7n6uH7 <mailto:CACxCfFo7n6uH7> =
> M0C3_ciOvsHkDsXiUSCHkFo7bvxsAqD3kh4w at mail.gmail.com <mailto:
> M0C3_ciOvsHkDsXiUSCHkFo7bvxsAqD3kh4w at mail.gmail.com> >
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
>
>
> In the beginning, there were people. And people raced on foot. And then man
> domesticated the animal, and raced that. And then man got creative, making
> cars, planes, boats, trains, rockets, and so on and so forth...and raced
> them all.
>
>
>
> Ham radio is the same. In the beginning there was CW. And then phone. And
> then RTTY. And then BPSK. And so on and so forth, until now with FT4.
>
>
>
> What I'm getting at is that FT4 contesting will still be just as much fun
> as
> CW, SSB, and RTTY, and just as competitive. But, I think now after reading
> a
> negative opinion or two on CQ-contest, QRZ, eHam, reddit, and elsewhere, is
> that the contesters ingrained in CW, phone, or RTTY radiosport will be hard
> pressed to believe me. Meanwhile contesters of modern-day modes will have
> as
> much fun with FT4 as those who have been contesting with CW for their
> lifetimes and it makes me sad that they'll be unlikely to share that
> experience. So, I challenge the naysayers to give it a try. I promise you
> that the "robot" you QSOing with will be no different than the N1MM
> automation that manage 99% of a contact already.
>
>
>
> -Sterling N0SSC
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>