[CQ-Contest] WARC band contesting is a thing now !

[af5cc2]

Field Day allowed operation on 12 and 17 for a couple of yearsSent via the Samsung Galaxy A10e, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: N4ZR <n4zr at comcast.net> Date: 2/8/20  6:01 PM  (GMT-06:00) To: cq-contest at contesting.com Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WARC band contesting is a thing now ! Seems likely to me that it was simple ignorance by the organizers.  I've seen a number of instances where inexperienced folks volunteered to handle a state QSO party and had one of those "wouldn't it be great if.we added something new..." ideas.  Usually not this bad, but in retrospect, I'm surprised this is the first time (that I can recall) this has happened since WARC 1979.73, Pete N4ZRCheck out the Reverse Beacon Networkat <http://reversebeacon.net>, nowspotting RTTY activity worldwide.For spots, please use your favorite"retail" DX cluster.On 2/8/2020 4:27 PM, Doug Grant wrote:> Some years ago I was helping with a ham radio demo at a big Boy Scout> event. Things were going great then two contests started (WAG and CQP I> think). 10 and 15 got very full of contest activity so I decided to try the> “If you want to get away from the contesters, try the WARC bands” idea to> see if it really would work.>> It was great! Had a bunch of excellent introductory QSOs on 12 and 17> meters with no QRM from those dang contesters.>> I support the “no contests on 12/17/30 meters” policy.>> The VTQP guys made a mistake and I hope they will not repeat it and that> nobody else makes the same mistake.>> 73,>> Doug K1DG> _______________________________________________> CQ-Contest mailing list> CQ-Contest at contesting.com> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest_______________________________________________CQ-Contest mailing listCQ-Contest at contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest