[CQ-Contest] World Wide Digi DX Contest Results

[rjairam at gmail.com]

There is fear of new things. Especially if the old ways have been
advantageous to you in the past.

I embrace the new modes and welcome this contest.

73
RIa, N2RJ

On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 at 08:59, David Gilbert <xdavid at cis-broadband.com> wrote:
>
>
> I didn't participate in the WW-Digi contest ... I just think it's a low
> blow to criticize a mode that's as new as this one.  I've had stations
> stacked ten deep on me on 20m FT4 outside of a contest (40m to Asia) so
> I know that it's possible to hit the rate I mentioned ... albeit
> briefly, of course.  But if the activity ever got high enough in a
> contest (and somebody came up with a better UI and a better logger than
> WSJT-X) things could be a lot of fun.
>
> I actually spent my day working the NAQP CW contest, so it's not like I
> don't have a frame of reference.
>
> 73,
> Dave  AB7E
>
>
> On 1/11/2020 7:39 PM, Edward Sawyer wrote:
> > Hello David.  Froom everything observed in real practice with the typically unsophisticated masses of FT8 users, its dreaming to think that such rates will ever be achieved.  All current data points to the rates experienced.  The question was about "how was it" nit "what you hope it to be".  So "how was it, actually?"
> >
> > As someone who is running most of the time, and not bandmap clicking, the experience is a world to actually be engaged with the participants, with my ears and brain.  I guess if someone's world in contesting is clicking on the bandmap, never actually verifying the call, and hitting a few function keys, then its not much different.  Thankfully, that's not my world of contesting.  IS it yours?
> >
> > Ed  N1UR
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces+edwards=sbelectronics.com at contesting.com] On Behalf Of David Gilbert
> > Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2020 9:07 PM
> > To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] World Wide Digi DX Contest Results
> >
> >
> > The rates would be considerably higher, and the operating somewhat less
> > confusing, if everyone operated FT4 instead of being spread across FT4
> > and FT8.  If you have a steady string of callers on FT4 the theoretical
> > maximum rate is 240 per hour, at least until you have to call CQ again.
> >
> > And I'm not sure that mouse clicks on a WSJT-X screen are any different
> > than mouse clicks on a CW or RTTY bandmap together with macro key
> > presses on a keyboard.  Possibly you can explain what you see being the
> > difference.
> >
> > 73,
> > Dave   AB7E
> >
> >
> > On 1/11/2020 5:26 PM, Edward Sawyer wrote:
> >> With the results in, I am curious as to the answer to this question.
> >>
> >> With 30 - 40 an hour rates over 24 hours and just looking at a computer screen and clicking mouses, was it fun?
> >>
> >> Ed  N1UR
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest