[CQ-Contest] WRTC2022 Qualification standings update

Joe nss at mwt.net
Wed Jan 22 18:26:35 EST 2020


I just love this WRTC Competition.

Well at least the part where they all use almost the same modest 
stations part.

And that's just it. (I'm puttying my Flame retardant suit on now)  I 
would like to see this Qualification procedure run say two ways.

Divide them up, 1/2 as it is now, anything goes, balls to the wall 
competition. Mega super stations and all that. Giant towers stacked 
yagis etc..

Then the other half,  have the qualification be like the stations they 
will be using.
A 3 element tribander at like 40 feet or less, and dipoles. and barefoot 
rigs. Of course no spotting too.

I bet there are quite a few operators out there that are just as good 
and even possibly better than many of the guys that get to go, but these 
other guys never will be able to go because their stations just cant 
compete with multiple stacked towers etc.

Level the Qualification playing field some too. for at least 1/2 the field,

that would be a neat experiment yes?

Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 1/22/2020 7:40 AM, Claudio Veroli wrote:
>   An important update to the qualification standings is available.
>
> It includes:
>
> CQWW CW 2019 Claimed scores added
> CQWW SSB 2019 Claimed scores added.
> RUSSIAN DX CONTEST 2019 Final scores added
> IARU HF 2019 Final scores added
> CQWW WPX CW 2019 Final scores added.
> ARRL DX CW 2019 final scores (fixed)
>
> Please visit, share and support WRTC2022 at www.wrtc2022.it
>
> 73 de Claudio I4VEQ
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list