[CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021
Jeff Clarke
ku8e at ku8e.com
Mon Nov 16 15:58:07 EST 2020
Why even bother to have a distributed category? It's so EASY to setup
one station to remote into. In fact I did it with someone in CA who
wasn't even setup as a remote station beforehand for the California QSO
Party. I took me less than a day of research and work to get it working.
Check out this excellent presentation Gerry, W1VE gave to the YCCC on
Zoom on how to do it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rl8-HR9bQyU Plus
no special equipment is needed to do this. It's free.
To add to what K8MR wrote why make a special category for M/M when it's
such a small percentage of the total number of stations that are on the air?
Jeff KU8E
On 11/16/2020 03:14 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
>
>
> It's a new M/M category, not a replacement for the existing M/M
> category. It's an "addition", not a "change". What causes that to
> be such a bad idea? Maybe it is, but I'm having a difficult time
> seeing it. If anything it makes an interesting possibility for lesser
> stations to collaborate, and I could imagine that it opens up some
> interesting strategy considerations.
>
> Dave AB7E
>
>
> "The 2021 CQ WW WPX RTTY, SSB and CW contests will include a new
> Multi-Transmitter Distributed category. Stations operating in this
> category
> may have a maximum of six transmitted signals, one per band at any one
> time,
> from stations in different locations. All equipment, including
> remotely-controlled equipment, must be located in same DXCC entity and CQ
> Zone. Six bands may be activated simultaneously. This is a new,
> stand-alone category. It is not intended to replace, or compete with,
> other
> multi-operator categories."
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11/16/2020 11:42 AM, K8MR via CQ-Contest wrote:
>> The more troubling change to me is the essentially no-limits
>> distributed multiops. Competitive Multi-op, especially multi-multi,
>> over the years has been a category for conspicuous consumption
>> station builders, combined with the chance for folks to spend a
>> weekend hanging out with other serious contesters. With COVID I
>> understand a place for distributing some stations over a relatively
>> small geographical area. And likewise having remote operators
>> operating a station with the equipment and antennas in one place.
>> But having a multi with transmitters and receivers in Maine and in
>> Miami, and anywhere in between, switching back and forth between
>> bands to take advantage of propagation advantages from a particular
>> location, is crazy. While this change is presently just for WPX, if
>> it is also a test run for CQWW, it's a very bad idea.
>> While over the years I've done a lot of multi-ops from K8AZ, mostly
>> in the ARRL and CQWW DX tests, operating as part of a "multi" while
>> sitting at my own station leaves me cold. And the contests benefit
>> from having more calls available to work, rather than putting in
>> single call "multi" efforts tying up lot of stations and people.
>>
>> 73 - Jim K8MR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list