[CQ-Contest] NAQP CW - Rules Changes Needed

[Pete Smith N4ZR]

With respect Art, "wimps"?  I would have stopped operating on Sunday in 
SS years ago if it weren't for the Assisted category - tqalk

"Forecasting a totally non-radio ham radio" is no reason for opposing 
this small and simple change. I contend that giving Assisted ops their 
own space would lead to further growth in NAQP participation, which is 
good for us all.

Look at all the major contests that have added Assisted categories over 
the last 20 years.  Have any of them suffered?

I probably would have voted with my feet on the NAQPs years ago if it 
weren't for the NAQP Cup competition among clubs.


73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the new Reverse Beacon Network
web server at <http://beta.reversebeacon.net>.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.

On 8/8/2021 1:08 PM, Art Boyars wrote:
> I don't exactly disagree with my friend N4ZR, but I'll offer some
> countering thoughts.
>
> - Top level, if enough people do not enjoy the contest, and participation
> goes down, then the VOLUNTEER organizers might consider changing the
> rule(s).  But this is "maybe should", and not "must".
>
> - Rate is fun (for most of us), but there are other facets of contesting
> that can be fun.  As a lower-tier station (and operator) with limited time
> window for NAQP, I sometimes go to the "wrong" band to boost my multiplier
> total.  Even in NAQP, I get a kick out of nabbing a rare one.  And I am
> obsessed with the sweep in SS.  (Does anybody try for the
> one-qso-per-Section sweep any more?  That would be 83 Sections in 83 QSOs
> nowadays.  Now, THAT is slo-o-o-w!)  Do you remember that DXers used to
> tune the band for hours looking for stations to work?
>
> - I've been Assisted at some multi-op stations, and I realize that there
> are some special skills involved.  But to me, they are so different from
> the old "turn the big knob" way that I learned that the game is completely
> different.  Maybe you like it better than I do.  I like it the way it is,
> even though I know that skimmer enables my CW runs.
>
> - It seems to me that the automatic spotting could grow to automatic
> running, and with just a little bit more technology we could eliminate the
> radio.  It's just a nuisance between the two ends of the QSO.  Somebody --
> I think K1DG or K1AR) wrote a fantasy about this many years ago.  How far
> away are we from its being reality?
>
> - If you change NAQP, the next thing will be the wimps crying to "fix" SS
> by allowing once-per-band QSOs.  If that happens, I think my age-driven
> departure will be hastened.
>
> 73, Art K3KU
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest