[CQ-Contest] Forum topic

ku8e ku8e at ku8e.com
Mon Aug 16 17:22:29 EDT 2021


I use a Microsoft Windows desktop application I wrote in C# and a Microsoft SQL Server database to check and process the Georgia QSO Party logs. Both Visual Studio and SQL Server can be downloaded for free from Microsoft if you're not using it for business purposes. It seems to work pretty good for me. I'm pretty familiar with this software since I used it professionally when I was working.I'm not sure what the limitations of either SQL Server or MySQL databases which are both available for free. I'm curious on what database software other log checkers use and their logic for cross checking QSO'S? I'm always looking to improve my process Jeff KU8E Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: Ed W0YK <ed at w0yk.com> Date: 8/16/21  9:44 AM  (GMT-05:00) To: Steve Dyer <w1srd at yahoo.com>, cq-contest at contesting.com Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Forum topic Current log checking software takes literally 2-3 minutes to fully process a few thousand logs with a few million QSOs, including all the results tables.  A moderate performance office PC is sufficient. Cleaning up log errors takes hundreds of volunteer hours before the final minutes-long computer run.  And, of course, gathering photos and information to create the results article is time-consuming.Log checking software is custom-created and supported by a few very smart volunteers.  Running time is inconsequential in the overall contest results process.73,Ed W0YK-------- Original message --------From: Steve Dyer via CQ-Contest <cq-contest at contesting.com> Date: 8/16/21  05:19  (GMT-08:00) To: cq-contest at contesting.com Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Forum topic These days that's a pretty small data set. It fits in memory easily and if I recall, each complete run only takes a minute or two. I saw a presentation about it somewhere from K5ZD.This is not trivializing the programming, it's just not a scale problem anymore.73,SteveW1SRDOn 8/15/2021 14:54, Richard F DiDonna NN3W wrote:> Has anyone ever done a Dayton forum or online forum on contest log> checking?  In briefly chatting with KL9A regarding the number of logs that> get submitted (over 1,000 in some NAQP events), it dawned on me that it> requires a little computing power to have a database of 2,500,000 QSOs> (assuming 1,000 logs with an average of 250 QSOs per log for NAQP) or a> database of 25,000,000 QSOs (assuming 5,000 logs and an average of 500 QSOs> per log for CQWW).>> How long does the log checking actually take and what database programs are> used these days?>> 73 Rich NN3W> _______________________________________________> CQ-Contest mailing list> CQ-Contest at contesting.com> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest_______________________________________________CQ-Contest mailing listCQ-Contest at contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest_______________________________________________CQ-Contest mailing listCQ-Contest at contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list