[CQ-Contest] Remote operation into the USA
EdwardS at advanced-conversion.com
Thu Jul 15 18:51:24 EDT 2021
I have an idea – maybe because the callsign was only issued last month? Yep – that would be it.
From: Edward Sawyer
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 5:04 PM
To: Barry W2UP <w2up.co at gmail.com>
Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation into the USA
Sorry, He would need to use KO1A as his call in order to be compliant. But he did not.
Why would he not use KO1A as required?
From: Barry W2UP <w2up.co at gmail.com<mailto:w2up.co at gmail.com>>
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 4:52 PM
To: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS at advanced-conversion.com<mailto:EdwardS at advanced-conversion.com>>
Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com<mailto:cq-contest at contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation into the USA
That one was easy. Look up the callsign on qrz.com<http://qrz.com>, then do a name search. It also brings up KO1A.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 2:28 PM Edward Sawyer <EdwardS at advanced-conversion.com<mailto:EdwardS at advanced-conversion.com>> wrote:
KO7SS wrote: "It would be easier to opine on this situation that is bothering you if you were to post up the callsigns in question, in public, on this reflector. There may be aspects of the details you do not know."
Sure, just an example, IZ3EYZ operating as KE5JSY from likely a third station location in the US. (not KE5JSY - although this is quite unclear) Its simply recent and relevant to WRTC qualification.
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
More information about the CQ-Contest