[CQ-Contest] Remote operation into the USA

[Edward Sawyer]

Interesting Ron.  So I guess the question is expanded from the original to what the requirement is for someone to use their own call in a contest generically.  If the "control operator" with the call is present, its not a Single Op entry.

Ed  N1UR

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw at verizon.net> 
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 9:23 PM
To: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS at advanced-conversion.com>
Cc: Barry W2UP <w2up.co at gmail.com>; cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation into the USA

I wondered about that, but the op in question had a 2x1 prior to his current call.  The 2x3 in question is assigned to an Extra in TX... not the same name, not even close.

Which may be why a polite inquiry to the op in question might well be in order.

73

> On Jul 15, 2021, at 6:51 PM, Edward Sawyer <EdwardS at advanced-conversion.com> wrote:
> 
> I have an idea – maybe because the callsign was only issued last month?  Yep – that would be it.
> 
> Ed  N1UR
> 
> From: Edward Sawyer
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 5:04 PM
> To: Barry W2UP <w2up.co at gmail.com>
> Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation into the USA
> 
> Sorry, He would need to use KO1A as his call in order to be compliant.  But he did not.
> 
> Why would he not use KO1A as required?
> 
> Ed  N1UR
> 
> From: Barry W2UP <w2up.co at gmail.com<mailto:w2up.co at gmail.com>>
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 4:52 PM
> To: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS at advanced-conversion.com<mailto:EdwardS at advanced-conversion.com>>
> Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com<mailto:cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation into the USA
> 
> That one was easy.  Look up the callsign on qrz.com<http://qrz.com>, then do a name search.  It also brings up KO1A.
> 
> Next...
> 
> Barry W2UP
> 
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 2:28 PM Edward Sawyer <EdwardS at advanced-conversion.com<mailto:EdwardS at advanced-conversion.com>> wrote:
> KO7SS wrote:  "It would be easier to opine on this situation that is bothering you if you were to post up the callsigns in question, in public, on this reflector. There may be aspects of the details you do not know."
> 
> Sure, just an example, IZ3EYZ operating as KE5JSY from likely a third station location in the US. (not KE5JSY - although this is quite unclear)  Its simply recent and relevant to WRTC qualification.
> 
> Ed  N1UR
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest