[CQ-Contest] Assisted vs "Unassisted"

[john at kk9a.com]

My 2016 reference was regarding the acronym not the practice.
http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-11/msg00385.html

I am sure that running CW on two radios has been done for a long time
however a few mutants have really perfected this practice in recent years.

John KK9A

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy 7 edge, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.


On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:57 AM Martin, LU5DX <lu5dx at lucg.com.ar> wrote:

> 2BSIQ was actually implemented, when conditions allowed for it, way before
> 2016.
> It didn't have that name though.
>
> https://cqww.com/publiclogs/2009cw/lp1h.log
>
> 73,
>
> Martin, LU5DX
>
> El vie., 19 mar. 2021 9:24 a. m., <john at kk9a.com> escribió:
>
>> I believe most CQ-Contest readers do know what 2BSIQ is. CT1BOH gave
>> it that name after the 2016 CQWW CW contest and the acronym has been
>> mentioned on this list over 130 times.  How many operators can do it
>> well?  I suspect not many.
>>
>> John KK9A
>>
>>
>> Ron W3WN wrote
>>
>> In Jim’s defense... I can believe him.  I didn’t know what the acronym
>> stood for, either.
>>
>> And, I’d wager that we’re not the only ones.
>>
>> 73, ron w3wn
>>
>> > OZ2I Henning  wrote:
>> >
>> > K9YC, Jim
>>
>> > And you really do not know what the meaning of "2BSIQ" is - or would you
>> > just point something out !
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>