[CQ-Contest] Don't forget to spot in CQWW SSB

[Paul O'Kane]

Then, perhaps N4ZR will let us know the "real" reason for K1AR's warning 
about the consequences of unintended cluster access.

With regard to technological innovation, I an opposed to "assisted" 
being considered a single-op category when it's clearly multi-op.

73,
Paul EI5DI




On 29/10/2021 02:59, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:
> I'd expect nothing less from you, Paul, given your long opposition to 
> all technological innovation - fact is, most cluster software has 
> set/nodx or the equivalent, to make sure no spots come your way when 
> you don't want them .
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> Check out the new Reverse Beacon Network
> web server at<http://beta.reversebeacon.net>.
> For spots, please use your favorite
> "retail" DX cluster.
>
> On 10/28/2021 5:38 PM, Paul O'Kane wrote:
>> It's simple - "unassisted" ops risk being DQed for accidental or 
>> unintended cluster access/use.
>>
>> 73,
>> Paul EI5DI
>>
>>
>>
>> On 28/10/2021 22:10, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:
>>> I don't understand, John.  What are you worried about?
>>>
>>> 73, Pete N4ZR
>>> Check out the new Reverse Beacon Network
>>> web server at<http://beta.reversebeacon.net>.
>>> For spots, please use your favorite
>>> "retail" DX cluster.
>>>
>>> On 10/28/2021 4:54 PM, John Dorr wrote:
>>>> The CQWW rules allow for outbound spotting as an unassisted entry. 
>>>> However, my advice is that if you are unassisted to avoid any use 
>>>> of the cluster. You’re only inviting the possibility of unintended 
>>>> access (or worse).
>>>>
>>>> 73, John, K1AR
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest