[CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 248, Issue 14
Bill Mader
billamader at gmail.com
Thu Aug 17 16:50:43 EDT 2023
Re: Contest SSB Frequencies
An important point to consider, especially in SSB contests is many callers
are not, constesters, or are minimally skilled. A surprisingly large
percentage of them find it challenging to tune in our signals well. I have
seen this up close when we bring in folks new to contesting at KS5Z in
Lubbock and, of course, during GOTA operation during FD. Being on a 1 kHz
step helps them.
73, Bill Mader, K8TE
ARRL New Mexico Section Manager
*ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio**™*
Secretary/Treasurer and Past President, Albuquerque DX Association
W6H NM Coordinator, Route 66 On-the-Air 8-17 Sep 2023
New Mexico QSO Party 13 Apr 2024
Duke City Hamfest Chairman www.dukecityhamfest.org
HamSCI.org Presenter for NOAA's 14 Oct 2023 Eclipse Event at the
Albuquerque International Balloon Fiesta
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 10:00 AM <cq-contest-request at contesting.com> wrote:
> Send CQ-Contest mailing list submissions to
> cq-contest at contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> cq-contest-request at contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cq-contest-owner at contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CQ-Contest digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Contest SSB Frequencies (Barry Jacobson)
> 2. Re: Contest SSB Frequencies (Richard F DiDonna NN3W)
> 3. Re: Contest SSB Frequencies (Jack Brindle)
> 4. Re: Contest SSB Frequencies (Pete Smith N4ZR)
> 5. Re: Contest SSB Frequencies (Charles ?Ed? Pitts)
> 6. Re: Contest SSB Frequencies (Barry Jacobson)
> 7. Re: Contest SSB Frequencies (pwhelton at earthlink.net)
> 8. QTCs (Jim Smith)
> 9. Re: Contest SSB Frequencies (Lee Hiers)
> 10. Re: Contest SSB Frequencies (Mike Fatchett W0MU)
> 11. Re: Contest SSB Frequencies (Hans Brakob)
> 12. Re: QTCs (Christian Janssen DL1MGB)
> 13. Re: Contest SSB Frequencies (Barry Jacobson)
> 14. Re: Contest SSB Frequencies (Steve London)
> 15. Re: Contest SSB Frequencies (Barry Jacobson)
> 16. Re: Contest SSB Frequencies (Pete Smith N4ZR)
> 17. Re: Contest SSB Frequencies (Jim Brown)
> 18. Re: Contest SSB Frequencies (Trent Sampson)
> 19. CTY-3326 Country Files - 17 August 2023 (Jim Reisert AD1C)
> 20. Contest SSB Frequencies (jpescatore at aol.com)
> 21. Re: Contest SSB Frequencies (Zack Widup)
> 22. Re: Contest SSB Frequencies (Joseph B. Fitzgerald)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 12:43:27 -0400
> From: Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>
> To: pwhelton at earthlink.net
> Cc: Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>, CQ-Contest Reflector
> <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID:
> <CACZHgvaxeZ_xGu1Q8u=f0WcgQ9RouhOH9tb+t=JCoMHms=+
> U4g at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> You hit the nail on the head! That is why since I was a kid was so afraid
> of SSB. I wore hearing aids then. But few years back, had to get cochlear
> implant. While it is louder, but there are issues with frequency
> distortion. Have written papers on Biorxiv.org about this. Was out of ham
> radio for a while. But recently got an FTDX101D and I am really surprised
> how good the SSB audio is, despite the cochlear implant. If you get the
> sweet spot, which is usually where maximum bass is, it sounds to me almost
> as good as in person. I set radio for widest response, except maybe roll
> off below 100 Hz if I use my Heath SB-600 speaker which has deep bass. I am
> still learning SSB, and find in contests some guys use pre-recorded audio
> where they swallow their words. No matter how many times you listen to
> their call, can't get it. Very important to enunciate each syllable and
> character, especially if recording.
>
> Best,
>
> Barry WA2VIU
>
> --
> Barry Jacobson
> WA2VIU
> bdj at alum.mit.edu
> @bdj_phd
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023, 12:25 PM <pwhelton at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi Barry. This probably won't answer your question but I did want to
> > comment where the guy "wanted to know your exact frequency so he could
> tune
> > it better". His comment is exactly why I don't like SSB contests. To me
> > everyone sounds like a duck and I have a hard time tuning them in.
> Don't
> > get me wrong I do participate in SSB contests but they are not my
> favorite.
> >
> > As an aside on CW I usually shoot for .050 Khz (i.e.: 21.015.50,
> > 21.031.50,
> > 21.037.50, etc).
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Pat - KZ5J
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+pwhelton=
> earthlink.net at contesting.com
> > >
> > On Behalf Of Barry Jacobson
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 9:51 AM
> > To: CQ-Contest Reflector <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> > Subject: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> >
> > Hi, due to poor hearing, I am not on SSB that much, but mainly CW.
> However,
> > some improvements with my hearing device have made me more willing to try
> > SSB. I am wondering if people always use integral number of KHz. In CW, I
> > never paid attention to exact freq, just found empty freq in band and
> > called
> > CQ. But recently was calling CQ for a ragchew in SSB, and the fellow
> said I
> > am on a fractional freq and wanted to know exactly what it was so he
> could
> > tune it better. Said was unusual. Is that always the practice in SSB and
> in
> > SSB contests to use whole numbers? I imagine the bands get crowded and
> not
> > always so easy to find a whole number freq. Please correct me if that is
> > standard practice in CW and RTTY, as well, something I never knew about.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Barry WA2VIU
> >
> > --
> > Barry Jacobson
> > WA2VIU
> > bdj at alum.mit.edu
> > @bdj_phd
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 11:44:43 -0400
> From: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w at gmail.com>
> To: Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>
> Cc: CQ-Contest Reflector <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID:
> <
> CACeNTbLrz7_EjKKvO1zEbf9wGfbyX1oY6hSu-BfAf8t5iWRtcg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Ideally yes - in reality, not even close to being possible.
>
> 73 Rich NN3W
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:29?AM Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> > Hi, due to poor hearing, I am not on SSB that much, but mainly CW.
> However,
> > some improvements with my hearing device have made me more willing to try
> > SSB. I am wondering if people always use integral number of KHz. In CW, I
> > never paid attention to exact freq, just found empty freq in band and
> > called CQ. But recently was calling CQ for a ragchew in SSB, and the
> fellow
> > said I am on a fractional freq and wanted to know exactly what it was so
> he
> > could tune it better. Said was unusual. Is that always the practice in
> SSB
> > and in SSB contests to use whole numbers? I imagine the bands get crowded
> > and not always so easy to find a whole number freq. Please correct me if
> > that is standard practice in CW and RTTY, as well, something I never knew
> > about.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Barry WA2VIU
> >
> > --
> > Barry Jacobson
> > WA2VIU
> > bdj at alum.mit.edu
> > @bdj_phd
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 10:45:35 -0500
> From: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle at me.com>
> To: Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>
> Cc: CQ-Contest Reflector <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID: <FCA79850-A929-465A-B46E-D8201098B904 at me.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> No. We tune anywhere we can find a free frequency. Sometimes it is better
> for the responder to be slightly off frequency (as it is in CW) to make
> their signal stand out.
>
> 73,
> Jack, W6FB
>
>
> > On Aug 16, 2023, at 9:50 AM, Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, due to poor hearing, I am not on SSB that much, but mainly CW.
> However,
> > some improvements with my hearing device have made me more willing to try
> > SSB. I am wondering if people always use integral number of KHz. In CW, I
> > never paid attention to exact freq, just found empty freq in band and
> > called CQ. But recently was calling CQ for a ragchew in SSB, and the
> fellow
> > said I am on a fractional freq and wanted to know exactly what it was so
> he
> > could tune it better. Said was unusual. Is that always the practice in
> SSB
> > and in SSB contests to use whole numbers? I imagine the bands get crowded
> > and not always so easy to find a whole number freq. Please correct me if
> > that is standard practice in CW and RTTY, as well, something I never knew
> > about.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Barry WA2VIU
> >
> > --
> > Barry Jacobson
> > WA2VIU
> > bdj at alum.mit.edu
> > @bdj_phd
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 11:50:42 -0400
> From: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr at gmail.com>
> To: Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>, reflector cq-contest
> <CQ-Contest at Contesting.COM>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID: <2c244e8e-3b48-e864-819d-12ef4de0af8b at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> In my opinion, you're being fed a line - in many years in ham radio I
> have never heard of any requirement or custom to use integer frequencies
> on SSB.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
>
> On 8/16/2023 10:50 AM, Barry Jacobson wrote:
> > Hi, due to poor hearing, I am not on SSB that much, but mainly CW.
> However,
> > some improvements with my hearing device have made me more willing to try
> > SSB. I am wondering if people always use integral number of KHz. In CW, I
> > never paid attention to exact freq, just found empty freq in band and
> > called CQ. But recently was calling CQ for a ragchew in SSB, and the
> fellow
> > said I am on a fractional freq and wanted to know exactly what it was so
> he
> > could tune it better. Said was unusual. Is that always the practice in
> SSB
> > and in SSB contests to use whole numbers? I imagine the bands get crowded
> > and not always so easy to find a whole number freq. Please correct me if
> > that is standard practice in CW and RTTY, as well, something I never knew
> > about.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Barry WA2VIU
> >
> > --
> > Barry Jacobson
> > WA2VIU
> > bdj at alum.mit.edu
> > @bdj_phd
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 11:48:42 -0400
> From: Charles ?Ed? Pitts <cpitts at ec.rr.com>
> To: Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>
> Cc: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID: <791D988F-979D-423D-9EA5-534278484969 at ec.rr.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Barry my experience is not to try and use whole numbers and it usually
> results in getting and holding a clear frequency. Always have to tune and
> find that sweet spot and hope u hold it! Lol! 73 Ed K5OF
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Aug 16, 2023, at 11:29, Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> >
> > ?Hi, due to poor hearing, I am not on SSB that much, but mainly CW.
> However,
> > some improvements with my hearing device have made me more willing to try
> > SSB. I am wondering if people always use integral number of KHz. In CW, I
> > never paid attention to exact freq, just found empty freq in band and
> > called CQ. But recently was calling CQ for a ragchew in SSB, and the
> fellow
> > said I am on a fractional freq and wanted to know exactly what it was so
> he
> > could tune it better. Said was unusual. Is that always the practice in
> SSB
> > and in SSB contests to use whole numbers? I imagine the bands get crowded
> > and not always so easy to find a whole number freq. Please correct me if
> > that is standard practice in CW and RTTY, as well, something I never knew
> > about.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Barry WA2VIU
> >
> > --
> > Barry Jacobson
> > WA2VIU
> > bdj at alum.mit.edu
> > @bdj_phd
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 12:10:04 -0400
> From: Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>
> To: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr at gmail.com>
> Cc: Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>, reflector cq-contest
> <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID:
> <
> CACZHgvaRKsWvsZfVgtzQsyCnHmNkB4fE3A57xVAiSuwtr7f7kg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Thanks very much, Richard, Jack, Ed and Pete. Seems consensus is not to
> worry about whole numbers.
>
> Best,
>
> Barry WA2VIU
>
> --
> Barry Jacobson
> WA2VIU
> bdj at alum.mit.edu
> @bdj_phd
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023, 11:50 AM Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > In my opinion, you're being fed a line - in many years in ham radio I
> have
> > never heard of any requirement or custom to use integer frequencies on
> SSB.
> >
> > 73, Pete N4ZR
> >
> > On 8/16/2023 10:50 AM, Barry Jacobson wrote:
> >
> > Hi, due to poor hearing, I am not on SSB that much, but mainly CW.
> However,
> > some improvements with my hearing device have made me more willing to try
> > SSB. I am wondering if people always use integral number of KHz. In CW, I
> > never paid attention to exact freq, just found empty freq in band and
> > called CQ. But recently was calling CQ for a ragchew in SSB, and the
> fellow
> > said I am on a fractional freq and wanted to know exactly what it was so
> he
> > could tune it better. Said was unusual. Is that always the practice in
> SSB
> > and in SSB contests to use whole numbers? I imagine the bands get crowded
> > and not always so easy to find a whole number freq. Please correct me if
> > that is standard practice in CW and RTTY, as well, something I never knew
> > about.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Barry WA2VIU
> >
> > --
> > Barry Jacobson
> > WA2VIUbdj at alum.mit.edu
> > @bdj_phd
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing listCQ-Contest at contesting.comhttp://
> lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 11:25:06 -0500
> From: <pwhelton at earthlink.net>
> To: "'Barry Jacobson'" <bdj at alum.mit.edu>, "'CQ-Contest Reflector'"
> <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID: <01fd01d9d05e$38795800$a96c0800$@earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi Barry. This probably won't answer your question but I did want to
> comment where the guy "wanted to know your exact frequency so he could tune
> it better". His comment is exactly why I don't like SSB contests. To me
> everyone sounds like a duck and I have a hard time tuning them in. Don't
> get me wrong I do participate in SSB contests but they are not my favorite.
>
> As an aside on CW I usually shoot for .050 Khz (i.e.: 21.015.50,
> 21.031.50,
> 21.037.50, etc).
>
> Regards,
>
> Pat - KZ5J
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+pwhelton=earthlink.net at contesting.com
> >
> On Behalf Of Barry Jacobson
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 9:51 AM
> To: CQ-Contest Reflector <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
>
> Hi, due to poor hearing, I am not on SSB that much, but mainly CW. However,
> some improvements with my hearing device have made me more willing to try
> SSB. I am wondering if people always use integral number of KHz. In CW, I
> never paid attention to exact freq, just found empty freq in band and
> called
> CQ. But recently was calling CQ for a ragchew in SSB, and the fellow said I
> am on a fractional freq and wanted to know exactly what it was so he could
> tune it better. Said was unusual. Is that always the practice in SSB and in
> SSB contests to use whole numbers? I imagine the bands get crowded and not
> always so easy to find a whole number freq. Please correct me if that is
> standard practice in CW and RTTY, as well, something I never knew about.
>
> 73,
>
> Barry WA2VIU
>
> --
> Barry Jacobson
> WA2VIU
> bdj at alum.mit.edu
> @bdj_phd
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 11:55:32 -0500
> From: Jim Smith <ars.kk0u at gmail.com>
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] QTCs
> Message-ID:
> <CAFvDhvqopUPZx20yXCV=
> 1zkgBX0e+SzvZKu8+8qSS3-VpGd1gw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> For those on the sending side of the pond, if you're not aware, Fabian DJ5W
> has a trainer here. <https://lcwo.net/qtc> You have to log in to use it,
> but it's a lot of fun.
>
> Fabian also posted a video of himself copying 50wpm QTCs typing only with
> his left thumb. <https://fkurz.net/stuff/thumb-qtc.html> Way beyond my
> pay
> grade.
>
> 73, Jim KK0U
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 15:10:21 -0400
> From: Lee Hiers <lee.hiers at gmail.com>
> Cc: CQ-Contest Reflector <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID:
> <CAEEr=
> 7OJeb_D4_4att903VX6phuBXOOfi8DsSV2eBp+bY6+50g at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 3:07?PM Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w at gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
>
> > Ideally yes - in reality, not even close to being possible.
>
>
> Why is it ideal to use integer frequencies??
>
> I know a lot of people (particularly, rag-chewers and nets) do, but why is
> it ideal?
>
> 73 de Lee, AA4GA
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 13:14:27 -0600
> From: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu at w0mu.com>
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID: <41a1eaed-9c56-e76b-3597-cafa8dd6da70 at w0mu.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> It would not matter what you told him.? While some people use GPS and
> other forms to absolutely be as perfect as they can with their frequency
> read outs, most don't.? On SSB you tune for what sound the best TO YOU.?
> I have never cared what the vfo says as long as I am able to make
> contacts and not interfering too much with other contests etc.? Same on
> CW where ever it is clear I use it.? With CW you would do well in
> pileups not to zero beat the station. Being off just a bit makes you
> sound a bit different or possibly easier to pick out.
>
> Good Luck
>
> W0MU
>
> On 8/16/2023 10:25 AM, pwhelton at earthlink.net wrote:
> > Hi Barry. This probably won't answer your question but I did want to
> > comment where the guy "wanted to know your exact frequency so he could
> tune
> > it better". His comment is exactly why I don't like SSB contests. To me
> > everyone sounds like a duck and I have a hard time tuning them in.
> Don't
> > get me wrong I do participate in SSB contests but they are not my
> favorite.
> >
> > As an aside on CW I usually shoot for .050 Khz (i.e.: 21.015.50,
> 21.031.50,
> > 21.037.50, etc).
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Pat - KZ5J
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+pwhelton=
> earthlink.net at contesting.com>
> > On Behalf Of Barry Jacobson
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 9:51 AM
> > To: CQ-Contest Reflector <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> > Subject: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> >
> > Hi, due to poor hearing, I am not on SSB that much, but mainly CW.
> However,
> > some improvements with my hearing device have made me more willing to try
> > SSB. I am wondering if people always use integral number of KHz. In CW, I
> > never paid attention to exact freq, just found empty freq in band and
> called
> > CQ. But recently was calling CQ for a ragchew in SSB, and the fellow
> said I
> > am on a fractional freq and wanted to know exactly what it was so he
> could
> > tune it better. Said was unusual. Is that always the practice in SSB and
> in
> > SSB contests to use whole numbers? I imagine the bands get crowded and
> not
> > always so easy to find a whole number freq. Please correct me if that is
> > standard practice in CW and RTTY, as well, something I never knew about.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Barry WA2VIU
> >
> > --
> > Barry Jacobson
> > WA2VIU
> > bdj at alum.mit.edu
> > @bdj_phd
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 19:33:07 +0000
> From: Hans Brakob <kzerohb at gmail.com>
> To: Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>, CQ-Contest Reflector
> <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID:
> <
> MN2PR04MB6688C7831279ADB0489B7BBDF115A at MN2PR04MB6688.namprd04.prod.outlook.com
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
>
> Barry, I also have severe hearing loss, so my operations are heavy on CW,
> RTTY, digital.
>
> Because the granularity of the clusters and RBN seems to be 100Hz (?), I
> never run on ?double nuts? frequencies (ending in ????). I generally tend
> to run on QRGs ending in ?.#3?? or thereabouts. The good operators will
> tune to me and stand out in my rx away from the clumped up ?click the spot
> and transmit? automatons.
>
> 73, de Hans, K?HB
> ?Just a Boy and his Radio??
>
> 73, de Hans, K?HB
> ?Just a Boy and his Radio??
> ________________________________
> From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+kzerohb=gmail.com at contesting.com> on
> behalf of Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 9:50:50 AM
> To: CQ-Contest Reflector <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
>
> Hi, due to poor hearing, I am not on SSB that much, but mainly CW. However,
> some improvements with my hearing device have made me more willing to try
> SSB. I am wondering if people always use integral number of KHz. In CW, I
> never paid attention to exact freq, just found empty freq in band and
> called CQ. But recently was calling CQ for a ragchew in SSB, and the fellow
> said I am on a fractional freq and wanted to know exactly what it was so he
> could tune it better. Said was unusual. Is that always the practice in SSB
> and in SSB contests to use whole numbers? I imagine the bands get crowded
> and not always so easy to find a whole number freq. Please correct me if
> that is standard practice in CW and RTTY, as well, something I never knew
> about.
>
> 73,
>
> Barry WA2VIU
>
> --
> Barry Jacobson
> WA2VIU
> bdj at alum.mit.edu
> @bdj_phd
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 21:42:00 +0200
> From: Christian Janssen DL1MGB <chris at dl1mgb.com>
> To: Jim Smith <ars.kk0u at gmail.com>, cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QTCs
> Message-ID: <3a1de371-eb7c-845f-7c8d-8092f42b5c0e at dl1mgb.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> And for those who need some training for the upcoming SSB part in
> September, I can also recommend this one:
>
> http://dl1mgb.com/contest/wae.php
>
> Have fun!
>
> 73s Chris DL1MGB
>
>
>
>
> Am 16.08.2023 um 18:55 schrieb Jim Smith:
> > For those on the sending side of the pond, if you're not aware, Fabian
> DJ5W
> > has a trainer here. <https://lcwo.net/qtc> You have to log in to use
> it,
> > but it's a lot of fun.
> >
> > Fabian also posted a video of himself copying 50wpm QTCs typing only with
> > his left thumb. <https://fkurz.net/stuff/thumb-qtc.html> Way beyond my
> pay
> > grade.
> >
> > 73, Jim KK0U
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:09:32 -0400
> From: Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>
> To: Hans Brakob <kzerohb at gmail.com>
> Cc: Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>, CQ-Contest Reflector
> <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID:
> <
> CACZHgvZMW4+x1T59VMt_sLHDOtUuWebwzeWRRLdvEcN9J9dCkA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Interesting approach, Hans. Never considered spotters when choosing freq.
> If you ever want to compare notes on hearing issues can always write me
> privately, any time.
>
> Best of luck.
>
> Barry WA2VIU
>
> --
> Barry Jacobson
> WA2VIU
> bdj at alum.mit.edu
> @bdj_phd
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023, 3:33 PM Hans Brakob <kzerohb at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Barry, I also have severe hearing loss, so my operations are heavy on CW,
> > RTTY, digital.
> >
> > Because the granularity of the clusters and RBN seems to be 100Hz (?), I
> > never run on ?double nuts? frequencies (ending in ????). I generally
> tend
> > to run on QRGs ending in ?.#3?? or thereabouts. The good operators will
> > tune to me and stand out in my rx away from the clumped up ?click the
> spot
> > and transmit? automatons.
> >
> > 73, de Hans, K?HB
> > ?Just a Boy and his Radio??
> >
> > 73, de Hans, K?HB
> > ?Just a Boy and his Radio??
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+kzerohb=gmail.com at contesting.com>
> > on behalf of Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 16, 2023 9:50:50 AM
> > *To:* CQ-Contest Reflector <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> > *Subject:* [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> >
> > Hi, due to poor hearing, I am not on SSB that much, but mainly CW.
> However,
> > some improvements with my hearing device have made me more willing to try
> > SSB. I am wondering if people always use integral number of KHz. In CW, I
> > never paid attention to exact freq, just found empty freq in band and
> > called CQ. But recently was calling CQ for a ragchew in SSB, and the
> fellow
> > said I am on a fractional freq and wanted to know exactly what it was so
> he
> > could tune it better. Said was unusual. Is that always the practice in
> SSB
> > and in SSB contests to use whole numbers? I imagine the bands get crowded
> > and not always so easy to find a whole number freq. Please correct me if
> > that is standard practice in CW and RTTY, as well, something I never knew
> > about.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Barry WA2VIU
> >
> > --
> > Barry Jacobson
> > WA2VIU
> > bdj at alum.mit.edu
> > @bdj_phd
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 14:18:56 -0600
> From: Steve London <n2icarrl at gmail.com>
> To: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w at gmail.com>
> Cc: Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>, CQ-Contest Reflector
> <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID:
> <CAB7zQ=
> 3a1CSf6LQm6h98j_LLYpms84xhmNgO6aZf0f2CZy+zRw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> This "you're on a fractional frequency" thing seems to be a characteristic
> of new hams. They have their tuning rate set to 1 kHz and don't understand
> how to change it to 10 or 100 Hz.
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 1:07?PM Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w at gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Ideally yes - in reality, not even close to being possible.
> >
> > 73 Rich NN3W
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:29?AM Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, due to poor hearing, I am not on SSB that much, but mainly CW.
> > However,
> > > some improvements with my hearing device have made me more willing to
> try
> > > SSB. I am wondering if people always use integral number of KHz. In
> CW, I
> > > never paid attention to exact freq, just found empty freq in band and
> > > called CQ. But recently was calling CQ for a ragchew in SSB, and the
> > fellow
> > > said I am on a fractional freq and wanted to know exactly what it was
> so
> > he
> > > could tune it better. Said was unusual. Is that always the practice in
> > SSB
> > > and in SSB contests to use whole numbers? I imagine the bands get
> crowded
> > > and not always so easy to find a whole number freq. Please correct me
> if
> > > that is standard practice in CW and RTTY, as well, something I never
> knew
> > > about.
> > >
> > > 73,
> > >
> > > Barry WA2VIU
> > >
> > > --
> > > Barry Jacobson
> > > WA2VIU
> > > bdj at alum.mit.edu
> > > @bdj_phd
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:23:39 -0400
> From: Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>
> To: Steve London <n2icarrl at gmail.com>
> Cc: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w at gmail.com>, Barry Jacobson
> <bdj at alum.mit.edu>, CQ-Contest Reflector <
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID:
> <CACZHgvY6t1_+Qhpk7fOuyD4w=
> qGM0Fsg-qGdx5hkp+CY3OQmQA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> I think he said in Canada they will use 500 Hz increments. But the FTDX101
> can go down to 5 Hz on SSB, if you like. Makes tuning slower, though.
>
> Barry WA2VIU
>
> --
> Barry Jacobson
> WA2VIU
> bdj at alum.mit.edu
> @bdj_phd
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023, 4:19 PM Steve London <n2icarrl at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This "you're on a fractional frequency" thing seems to be a
> characteristic
> > of new hams. They have their tuning rate set to 1 kHz and don't
> understand
> > how to change it to 10 or 100 Hz.
> >
> > 73,
> > Steve, N2IC
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 1:07?PM Richard F DiDonna NN3W <
> richnn3w at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Ideally yes - in reality, not even close to being possible.
> >>
> >> 73 Rich NN3W
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:29?AM Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi, due to poor hearing, I am not on SSB that much, but mainly CW.
> >> However,
> >> > some improvements with my hearing device have made me more willing to
> >> try
> >> > SSB. I am wondering if people always use integral number of KHz. In
> CW,
> >> I
> >> > never paid attention to exact freq, just found empty freq in band and
> >> > called CQ. But recently was calling CQ for a ragchew in SSB, and the
> >> fellow
> >> > said I am on a fractional freq and wanted to know exactly what it was
> >> so he
> >> > could tune it better. Said was unusual. Is that always the practice in
> >> SSB
> >> > and in SSB contests to use whole numbers? I imagine the bands get
> >> crowded
> >> > and not always so easy to find a whole number freq. Please correct me
> if
> >> > that is standard practice in CW and RTTY, as well, something I never
> >> knew
> >> > about.
> >> >
> >> > 73,
> >> >
> >> > Barry WA2VIU
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Barry Jacobson
> >> > WA2VIU
> >> > bdj at alum.mit.edu
> >> > @bdj_phd
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> >> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> >> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >>
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 17:29:15 -0400
> From: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr at gmail.com>
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID: <c8786859-a437-25c5-5ca0-67eff5882ee4 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> I think a distinction needs to be made for CW - if (as usually happens),
> a large part of the pileup is the result of just clicking on a spot,?
> because of the100 Hz resolution of the packet network, then? I submit
> that what you really want to do, if you're an Assisted op, is is to move
> a little off the clicked frequency - I generally move toward the DX,
> approaching zero-beat and it seems to work well.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
>
> On 8/16/2023 3:14 PM, Mike Fatchett W0MU wrote:
> > It would not matter what you told him.? While some people use GPS and
> > other forms to absolutely be as perfect as they can with their
> > frequency read outs, most don't.? On SSB you tune for what sound the
> > best TO YOU.? I have never cared what the vfo says as long as I am
> > able to make contacts and not interfering too much with other contests
> > etc.? Same on CW where ever it is clear I use it.? With CW you would
> > do well in pileups not to zero beat the station. Being off just a bit
> > makes you sound a bit different or possibly easier to pick out.
> >
> > Good Luck
> >
> > W0MU
> >
> > On 8/16/2023 10:25 AM, pwhelton at earthlink.net wrote:
> >> Hi Barry.? This probably won't answer your question but I did want to
> >> comment where the guy "wanted to know your exact frequency so he
> >> could tune
> >> it better".? His comment is exactly why I don't like SSB contests.?
> >> To me
> >> everyone sounds like a duck and I have a hard time tuning them in.??
> >> Don't
> >> get me wrong I do participate in SSB contests but they are not my
> >> favorite.
> >>
> >> As an aside on CW I usually shoot for .050 Khz (i.e.: 21.015.50,
> >> 21.031.50,
> >> 21.037.50, etc).
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Pat - KZ5J
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: CQ-Contest
> >> <cq-contest-bounces+pwhelton=earthlink.net at contesting.com>
> >> On Behalf Of Barry Jacobson
> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 9:51 AM
> >> To: CQ-Contest Reflector <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> >> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> >>
> >> Hi, due to poor hearing, I am not on SSB that much, but mainly CW.
> >> However,
> >> some improvements with my hearing device have made me more willing to
> >> try
> >> SSB. I am wondering if people always use integral number of KHz. In
> >> CW, I
> >> never paid attention to exact freq, just found empty freq in band and
> >> called
> >> CQ. But recently was calling CQ for a ragchew in SSB, and the fellow
> >> said I
> >> am on a fractional freq and wanted to know exactly what it was so he
> >> could
> >> tune it better. Said was unusual. Is that always the practice in SSB
> >> and in
> >> SSB contests to use whole numbers? I imagine the bands get crowded
> >> and not
> >> always so easy to find a whole number freq. Please correct me if that is
> >> standard practice in CW and RTTY, as well, something I never knew about.
> >>
> >> 73,
> >>
> >> Barry WA2VIU
> >>
> >> --
> >> Barry Jacobson
> >> WA2VIU
> >> bdj at alum.mit.edu
> >> @bdj_phd
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 19:10:50 -0700
> From: Jim Brown <k9yc at audiosystemsgroup.com>
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID:
> <29dc0232-920d-3a95-c2cf-6023761f0aa5 at audiosystemsgroup.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> On 8/16/2023 1:18 PM, Steve London wrote:
> > This "you're on a fractional frequency" thing seems to be a
> characteristic
> > of new hams. They have their tuning rate set to 1 kHz and don't
> understand
> > how to change it to 10 or 100 Hz.
>
> Thanks, Steve. I couldn't imagine what this was about!
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 03:20:55 +0000
> From: Trent Sampson <vk4ts at outlook.com>
> To: Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>, CQ-Contest Reflector
> <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID:
> <
> PH0PR11MB4984FD0F2ED9B91D1A989DA6F21AA at PH0PR11MB4984.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi Barry,
>
> We have found on 10m that rounded frequencies in 5kHz banks are
> problematic to local services in nearby countries.
> we try to avoid say 28.400 28.405 etc
>
> Good luck with your quest
>
> Trent
> VK4TS
> VK4T WW7TT M0HTT
> PO Box 275
> Mooloolaba 4557
> 0408497550
>
> ________________________________
> From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+vk4ts=outlook.com at contesting.com> on
> behalf of Barry Jacobson <bdj at alum.mit.edu>
> Sent: Thursday, 17 August 2023 00:50
> To: CQ-Contest Reflector <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
>
> Hi, due to poor hearing, I am not on SSB that much, but mainly CW. However,
> some improvements with my hearing device have made me more willing to try
> SSB. I am wondering if people always use integral number of KHz. In CW, I
> never paid attention to exact freq, just found empty freq in band and
> called CQ. But recently was calling CQ for a ragchew in SSB, and the fellow
> said I am on a fractional freq and wanted to know exactly what it was so he
> could tune it better. Said was unusual. Is that always the practice in SSB
> and in SSB contests to use whole numbers? I imagine the bands get crowded
> and not always so easy to find a whole number freq. Please correct me if
> that is standard practice in CW and RTTY, as well, something I never knew
> about.
>
> 73,
>
> Barry WA2VIU
>
> --
> Barry Jacobson
> WA2VIU
> bdj at alum.mit.edu
> @bdj_phd
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.contesting.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcq-contest&data=05%7C01%7C%7C3cd29af19bd64460eacd08db9e6d9d11%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638277965858047617%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=U%2FPZYcgNq9BhtLdtx4cCJCS4fTineIb4kmN8UeqJhow%3D&reserved=0
> <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 22:37:33 -0600
> From: "Jim Reisert AD1C" <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>
> To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] CTY-3326 Country Files - 17 August 2023
> Message-ID: <mailman.4.1692288001.1529.cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> The Country (CTY) Files were updated on 17 August 2023:
>
> https://www.country-files.com/cty-3326-17-august-2023/
>
> For installation instructions, start at:
>
> https://www.country-files.com/
>
> Hover your mouse over the word Contest in the menu, then select the
> software you are using.
>
> To install the file, follow the link to your software at the top of the
> page.
>
> If you are interested in a bigger CTY.DAT for everyday logging, you can get
> it here:
>
> https://www.country-files.com/big-cty-17-august-2023/
>
> Note that the release notes (and Version Entity) for this larger file are
> different than what is shown below. There is a separate link to them.
>
> As a reminder, there is an RSS feed of the latest country file
> announcements:
>
> https://www.country-files.com/feed/
>
> Here are the release notes:
>
> 17 August 2023 (CTY-3326)
> VER20230817, Version entity is Peru, OA
>
> Added/changed Entities/Prefixes/Callsigns:
>
> * IT9ACJ/I/BO is Sicily, *IT9
> * 9M66M is West Malaysia, 9M2
> * 9M66MQ and 9M66MS are both East Malaysia, 9M6
> * E51D is North Cook Islands, E5/n in ITU zone 63
> * GB0NHL, GB1CWC, GB1OL, GB2LG and GB2THL are all Scotland, GM
> * GB5DD and GB5VAS are both Guernsey, GU
> * GB1HBL is Wales, GW
> * IO0C is Sardinia, IS
> * W2NQ is United States, K in CQ zone 3, ITU zone 6
> * LU5DNH/F and LU8DCH/D are both Argentina, LU
> * LU3VAL/V is Argentina, LU in ITU zone 16
> * UA4HAZ/P is in ITU zone 30, not ITU zone 29
> * R90WFR and RW9W/P are both European Russia, UA
> * RX9WT/P is Asiatic Russia, UA9 in CQ zone 16
> * R2EC/9, UA0DAR/P and UF8F/0 are all Asiatic Russia, UA9 in CQ
> zone 18, ITU zone 32
> * RA1WS/0 is Asiatic Russia, UA9 in CQ zone 19, ITU zone 23
> * R20RMP is Asiatic Russia, UA9 in CQ zone 19, ITU zone 34
> * ZP6RAI/F, ZP6RAI/H, ZP6RAI/L and ZP6RAI/V are all Paraguay, ZP
>
> Removed Entities/Prefixes/Callsigns:
>
> * GR6ICR in Isle of Man, GD
> * 2R0WMN, GR3SG, MR0ILE, MR0NOR, MR0TLG and MR7DXL in Northern
> Ireland, GI
> * 2R0JVR, 2R0XZA, GB2DRC, GB2KDR, GB2OWM, GB2TMH, GR0AZC, GR0OPS,
> GR3WUX,
> GR3ZZA, GR5AUG, GR5DX, GR6ZAK, GR8VL, MR0DHQ, MR0GOR, MR0HVU,
> MR0JNL, MR0KFR,
> MR0T, MR3DDQ, MR3JFM, MR3SVK and MR7RVP in Scotland, GM
> * MR0FAL in Guernsey, GU
> * 2R0FLW, 2R0HQA, 2R0JYN, 2R0YLW, 2R1BRY, GB0ATM, GB0TBL, GB1HMM,
> GB4KCC,
> GR0ANA, GR4BML, GR4CVT, GR4NOO, GR6YML, MR0DX, MR0ION, MR0PJE,
> MR6IUT,
> MR6JUY, MR7KJC and MR7OFS in Wales, GW
> * K7DR and WB5KFP in United States, K
> * K6T, KG5HMM and KH8RRC in Hawaii, KH6
> * KI6WBS in Alaska, KL
> * LU8DCH/E in Argentina, LU
> * TA1TW/6 in Asiatic Turkey, TA
> * R150RSW, R150UR, R320P, R9CS/6 and UG4I/P in European Russia, UA
> * RV3DSA/0 in Asiatic Russia, UA9
> * ZQ2YN in Gibraltar, ZB
>
> Though I am subscribed to this reflector so that I can make these
> announcements, I do not see most messages posted to it. If you have
> any comments or corrections to the country file, please contact me
> directly.
>
> 73 - Jim AD1C
>
> --
> Jim Reisert AD1C, <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, https://ad1c.us
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 20
> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 10:23:41 +0000 (UTC)
> From: "jpescatore at aol.com" <jpescatore at aol.com>
> To: "cq-contest at contesting.com" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID: <1960432015.755267.1692267821298 at mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Definitely a silly thing for contest QSOs, but:
> Years ago I had a ragchew SSB contact where the guy wanted to know what my
> dial freq was because he always liked to hear what someone really sounded
> like. I explained to him that with the limited bandwidth we use on SSB in
> our microphones and radios, no one sounds like they do in real life anyway.
> If he wanted something closer to what ops sounded like IRL, he could go to
> 3885 and join the HiFi AMers.
> The first time you talk to one of your kids on the telephone, they don't
> even recognize you - the identifying features of you don't get through that
> limited bandwidth. The phonemes for intelligibility do, but not the facets
> for speaker identification.
> Though, there are some speech patterns that are so unique, they stand out:
> Fred K3ZO calling CQ in a contest was identifiable even if you listed
> through a CW filter...
> 73 John K3TN
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 21
> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 07:51:12 -0500
> From: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack at gmail.com>
> To: CQ Contest <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID:
> <CANJxhWjvQk54KsAeJb3Juc06cVsBgkh5J9_TKGw=
> j3yCbOSmfw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> There are some hams who use DRM (Digital Radio Mondiale). Not only is the
> tuning not very critical, but it sounds like the person is right there in
> your room with you.
>
> 73, Zack W9SZ
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 7:38?AM jpescatore--- via CQ-Contest <
> cq-contest at contesting.com> wrote:
>
> > Definitely a silly thing for contest QSOs, but:
> > Years ago I had a ragchew SSB contact where the guy wanted to know what
> my
> > dial freq was because he always liked to hear what someone really sounded
> > like. I explained to him that with the limited bandwidth we use on SSB in
> > our microphones and radios, no one sounds like they do in real life
> anyway.
> > If he wanted something closer to what ops sounded like IRL, he could go
> to
> > 3885 and join the HiFi AMers.
> > The first time you talk to one of your kids on the telephone, they don't
> > even recognize you - the identifying features of you don't get through
> that
> > limited bandwidth. The phonemes for intelligibility do, but not the
> facets
> > for speaker identification.
> > Though, there are some speech patterns that are so unique, they stand
> out:
> > Fred K3ZO calling CQ in a contest was identifiable even if you listed
> > through a CW filter...
> > 73 John K3TN
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 22
> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 14:36:15 +0000
> From: "Joseph B. Fitzgerald" <jfitzgerald at alum.wpi.edu>
> To: Trent Sampson <vk4ts at outlook.com>, Barry Jacobson
> <bdj at alum.mit.edu>, CQ-Contest Reflector <
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest SSB Frequencies
> Message-ID:
> <
> PH0PR22MB28278F23A0DC86E4E221AF61871AA at PH0PR22MB2827.namprd22.prod.outlook.com
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> During an SSB contest there is absolutely no reason to be on an "exact"
> frequency. There isn't really one for rag chewing either, but a lot of
> people do it, perhaps out of habit due to checking into nets, where it
> makes more sense to be on an exact frequency.
>
> I used to drive my roommate in college crazy as I set my alarm clock to
> "about" 8 am. Might be 7:57 one day, 8:02 the next. For some reason
> that really bugged him.
>
> de KM1P Joe
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 248, Issue 14
> *******************************************
>
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list