[CQ-Contest] "Back in the day" -- Single- or Multi-op?

Zack Widup w9sz.zack at gmail.com
Thu Oct 12 09:58:56 EDT 2023


 This is now. That was then. Rules can be changed. Back then, the key word
was Multi-OP.  If the person was not actually OPERATING, he was not
considered an operator. So a Single-OP could have someone else log for him.

I'm not sure when the rule was changed. Probably when we started to develop
all this new technology.

73, Zack W9SZ

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:19 AM Art Boyars <artboyars at gmail.com> wrote:

> On the N1MM+ reflector somebody wrote:
>
> "For those of us who have been around amateur contesting a while (1966
> here), you probably called the assistant who listens to the QSO and records
> the QSO details a "logger."  A single-op station could usually have one and
> sometimes more, but none of them was allowed to transmit; doing so made the
> entry Multi-Op."
>
> I never heard of such a thing.  I would have thought that having a "logger"
> made you multi-op.
>
> Can anybody here on CQ-Contest provide reliable info on the matter?
>
> 73, Art K3KU
> Contesting since a little earlier than 1966
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list